Monday, June 18, 2012

Op-ed:
Executive Orders + Obama = abuse of power 
By: Diane Sori

Barack Hussein Obama has abused the executive power granted him as president.  He just revels in bypassing our systems of checks and balances and legislative procedures by issuing Executive Order after Executive Order, all going against the wishes of ‘We the People.’

The time to reign in the use of the Executive Order privilege is upon us, because it will just get worse if we don’t.

But the question really is, do we even need Executive Orders at all, as they give definitive power to one individual and that is NOT what our Founders intended. Simply, Executive Orders are a rule or order issued by the president to an executive branch of the government (or agency) and having the power of law. While Executive Orders do bypass Congress and the legislative process, no Executive Order may direct any agency to conduct illegal or unconstitutional activities, at least they’re not supposed to.

Hear that Obama.

However, the term ‘Executive Order’ itself has never been defined by Congress.  Neither has Congress or the courts ruled to the extent or limit they can be used. And, there is no provision or statute in the Constitution that specifically allows for Executive Orders.  A vague musing of ‘executive power’ in Article ll, Section 1, Clause 1 of the Constitution (“The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America...”), and the words "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed..." is taken to mean to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution" (Article II, Section 1, clause 7).  From these words alone it’s been decided presidents have the authority to issue ‘Executive Orders.’

Since Obama is unable to get his proposed bills passed in the House, he's using his executive powers to issue Executive Orders (128 to date), to do what he wants to do, which is to circumnavigate Congressional approval as he either changes existing laws from what they were intended to do or negates them completely. His latest was just this past Friday when he used his executive authority to stop deportation proceedings for young immigrants under age 30, who entered the U.S. illegally but who meet certain criteria he alone has determined, which directly go against our current immigration laws. 

Now here is something very interesting most people don’t know: in extreme cases Congress may pass an emergency law that alters an Executive Order, and/or declares an Executive Order unconstitutional thus allowing it to be overturned by the Supreme Court.

(To date, two Executive Orders have been overturned, those being a 1952 Executive Order of  HarryTruman’s that placed all steel mills in the country under federal control, and a 1995 Executive Order of Bill Clinton’s that attempted to prevent the federal government from contracting with organizations that had strike breakers on their payroll.

Well, if allowing 800,00 ILLEGALS under the age of 30 to basically get what amounts to amnesty, and in the process taking jobs away from LEGAL Americans, if this does NOT constitute an emergency than I don’t know what does.

But now we face a problem that we’ve faced so many times before...that is that this sitting Congress does NOT have the guts, courage, or fortitude to stand up to this miserable pathetic excuse of a president.

And this is so sad.  Congressional leaders have come forward questioning many of Obama’s Executive Orders, even going so far as to say that many appear unconstitutional, and yet all they do is talk, whine, and then sit back, twiddle their thumbs and do nothing even while knowing they have the power to overturn some, and that’s more than sad, it’s unconscionable.

What’s happened to those we elected to do ‘the people’s business’...are they all cowards...it sure seems that way.  Here we have a just initiated Executive Order that we know breeches Constitutional limits of power, an Executive Order that probably could be successfully overturned by Congress, yet no one, not one single Congressperson has called for this action to even be initiated.

So now I want to know where all America’s heroes and champions have gone...besides for our men and women in uniform, it seems those we counted on to be our champions, to be our voice, are no more.

10 comments:

  1. Some of Obama's Executive orders --

    # 10990 allows the Government to take over all modes of transportation and control of highways and seaports.
    # 10995 allows the government to seize and control the communication media
    # 10997 allows the government to take over all electrical power, gas, petroleum, fuels, and minerals.
    # 11000 allows the government to mobilize civilians into work brigades under government supervision."
    all can be found on white house. Gov

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obama has issued 128 Executive Orders all going against the wishes of 'We the People' as he reigns in our freedoms and dishonors our Constitution.

      Delete
    2. None of the executive orders cited by anonymous were issued by Obama. Executive orders are logged numerically from president to president. Obama's first executive order was EO 13489- long after EO 10990. All of the orders cited by anonymous were orders issued by Kennedy, not Obama. Do a little research first.

      Every President has used executive orders. Bush Jr used them to avoid releasing documents in the Plame case. Bush Jr issued 291, Clinton 362, H W Bush 165, and Reagan 380. Here's a real whopper for you. FDR issued 3728, 573 of those in 1933 alone.

      Each side will cry foul when a sitting President's executive order doesn't agree with their party.

      Delete
    3. You are so right about that...it's called sour grapes! Anonymous just loves to stick-up for Obama and since he hides behind the word 'anonymous' ans does NOT show his face, his credibility is non-existent anyway.

      Delete
  2. I don't think Anonymous is trying to stick up for Obama. Quite the contrary. Nor do I believe that Obama's use of the executive order is wrong or unconstitutional.

    The reference is made regarding Obama's recent order regarding young illegal immigrants. First, you have to realize the immigration laws haven't been strongly enforced for years. Well before Obama, Clinton , or even both Bush. Therefore, over the last 30-40 years there has been an influx of immigrants. Now, it is impractical to think that we can round up all illegal immigrants and think that we can deport them all. Sure, secure the borders and begin enforcing the laws we have in place, but we have to address the issue of those who are here. This order does not grant amnesty. It gives young immigrants, most who have known no other life than one in America, a work permit for two years. If they don't meet the guidelines after two years, they can be deported. This will allow them to become contributing members of society, pay taxes, etc. This will not cause an influx of immigrants to run to the US. Like the Dream Act, it only applies to immigrants currently here.

    I think that you might have misunderstood my position. I do not consider Obama a traitor. I don't think that Elbert is trying to radically alter our nation or turn everyone to Islam.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry but I consider Obama the worst president in our history, a traitor of the first degree, and a muslim who would love to see our country turned into his personal caliphate. This underhanded revision to our immigration laws is politically motivated as the time frame is just to close for comfort, plus this is a band-aid NOT a solution. I have explained all this in a previous Op-ed.

      Delete
  3. We are both entitled to our opinions. While I don't agree with yours, I do respect that you haven't been rude while I express mine.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And I respect your opinions even though I do NOT agree with them. And yes, we both are entitled to our opinions and I'm glad we can give them without atomosity.

      Delete
  4. A. The move was political.
    B. Question to Mandy. If as you say it is impractical to round up illegal aliens now, then how do you propose to round them up if they fail to meet the guidelines after two years that you cited as part of the "non political" amnesty deal that Obama dictated? And all this, just after his revelation that he is "Okay with gay marriage".
    C. Everything he does is political and his minions are either blind or in denial.
    D. I am Arthur C. Nicholas

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with everything you said! And thank you for having the courage to give your name and stand by your convictions.

      Delete