Tuesday, October 28, 2014

Control of the U.S. Senate is up for grabs on Nov. 4, and illegal voters may tip the balance. Estimates are that more than 14 percent of non-citizens were registered to vote in the elections of 2008 and 2010, and that could now easily exceed the margin of victory in many tight Senate races.

Democrats typically win more than 80 percent of the votes cast by non-citizens, so votes cast by non-citizens produce a net bonanza of additional votes for Democrats. Democrat Al Franken won a Republican U.S. Senate seat in Minnesota by a margin of only 312 votes in 2008, and with the immense power of incumbency he is expected to cruise to reelection this time.

New non-partisan research by professors at Old Dominion University uncovered the shocking amount of voting by non-citizens, as published by the Washington Post last Friday. Their work did not choose sides in the debate over whether non-citizens should be allowed to vote, which Congress has already answered in the negative by sensibly limiting voting in federal elections to only American citizens.

This study concluded that voter ID alone will not eliminate voting by non-citizens, because voter ID does not require proof of citizenship, such as a passport or birth certificate. But that loophole is easily closed by requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, just as one must show proof of citizenship in order to obtain a passport.

Several states enacted common-sense provisions in order to strengthen voter integrity in this year's election. The U.S. Supreme Court denied an attempt to block voter ID from going into effect in Texas, so at least the Lone Star state will be able to limit mischief at their polls in this election.

Other states are not so fortunate. Wisconsin passed a voter ID law that was upheld by the Seventh Circuit, but the U.S. Supreme Court then blocked that good law from going into effect this November.

In July, three non-citizens were indicted for illegal voting in Ohio in the 2012 presidential election.

But most illegal voting cases end in a plea bargain that results in erasure of the convictions after a year if the defendant stays out of additional trouble for that long.

In Colorado, which could decide which party controls the U.S. Senate, votes are now cast entirely by mail with little protection against voter fraud. A total of 3.6 million ballots were sent to Coloradans based on addresses as old as 2008, which is six years ago.

One Colorado state senator said he has been to households that have received as many as seven separate ballots, and the person now living there could vote all seven ballots without anyone noticing.

Paid political activists, known as "harvesters," can gather up to 10 ballots of others and then dump them all in an unguarded drop box, and there is nothing that stops harvesters from gathering and voting even more.

What happens to unused ballots that people throw out after receiving them in the mail? Most people do not shred their trash, so many unused ballots inevitably end up in apartment complex garbage bins where they are available to be filled in and sent in by unscrupulous party workers.

The lack of voting integrity makes it far from clear whether the election outcome will reflect the will of the voters. The essential role played by poll watchers is impossible in Colorado's system of mail-only balloting.

The corrupt practice of counting votes that were cast in the names of dead people reemerged in North Carolina in 2012. The executive director of that state's election board reported that the votes of 81 dead people were counted, most of whom had died before it was possible for them to cast absentee ballots.

A shocking total of 35,570 voters in North Carolina had the same last and first names and birth dates of voters who also cast ballots in other states. Many hundreds of those voters even had the same last four digits of their Social Security numbers as people having identical names and birthdays who also voted in other states.

Reforms passed in North Carolina are not effective in time to ensure voter integrity in this election, where there is a close race for the U.S. Senate seat. No voter ID is yet in effect there.

The top priority of Obama's Department of Justice has been to oppose voter ID laws passed by various states. But Attorney General Eric Holder has announced his resignation, and the Senate should not confirm any successor who opposes state efforts to improve voter integrity.

7 comments:

  1. Challenge EVERY vote! Leave NO stone unturned! I'm so sick of these goddamed illegals taking a dump on our laws. They need to go back to MEXICO. No wonder the Democrats don't want them to show any kind of proof of citizenship, they lose votes.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow do you guys ever stop and listen to yourselves? So you think people that come here illegally, that live in fear of being caught and deported every day, will risk going to cast a frigging vote? Are you that stupid?

    "Voter fraud" is a tool thought up by the likes of the Koch brothers. It only exists in your puny little brains.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes...illegals commit voter fraud! I hope you read the article which explained there is MORE voter fraud than meets the eye.

      There is great risk of voter fraud by mail in ballots. The democrats refuse to protest because the vast majority of fradulent ballots cast are for democrats.

      Because of so much voter fraud, is it really too much to ask for a non-biased person to inspect those ballots to insure the election is fair. I don't care who you people vote for, but each person gets ONE vote and must be ELIGIBLE to vote. Is that too much to ask?

      I just want a fair election!

      Delete
  3. "Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate, than that these people are to be free; nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion have drawn indelible lines of distinction between them."

    -- Thomas Jefferson

    My humble response to Thomas Jefferson’s quote: NO, the two can’t live under the same government. The blacks don’t want a government, sir. They want something where they are taken care of from cradle to grave!

    Contrary to what some tell us, our forefathers knew that the black race was sub-par intellectually and did not measure up in a civilized world (even in their time.)

    In the Jefferson Memorial, I read on-line the part of the quote mentioned was this: “Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free”…why not the rest? If what I read on the internet was false, then I am sorry. However, if not, then this shows that even in Jefferson’s day the forefathers were wary of blacks.

    We have given the vote to something little better than gorillas in the mist.

    We are a stupid, stupid people!

    By the way...Abraham Lincoln did not support freeing the slaves during his speeches.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow, Diane, your local racists just keeps getting worse and worse!! Why don't you chime in with one of your patented "I agree with everything you said" statements? Do you not have enough balls to stand up to a racist just because he's on your "side of the isle"? I wonder what your buddy Col. West would think about being called a "gorilla"?

      Delete
    2. Question...are you white or black?

      Delete
    3. If white...then go to St. Louis and walk the streets where the gentle giant walked. Then call me racists after you have had the holy shit beat out of you for being white in a black community.

      Why should I love black people? You tell me! Give me some facts to back up why they are good for communities. It should be fun to read all the benefits of living in a black community. They are such a peaceful people.

      Delete