Op-ed:

A Bad Resolution...An Unacceptable Solution...Peace Questionable At Best

By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots / Right Side Patriots Radio

The Op-ed posted here is my opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.com nor Google.

...And then there's Jordan, the country the Palestinians rightfully should call home. King Abdullah II (the “kinglet” as he is known to some) has stated on numerous occasions that Jordan will take in no Palestinian refugees for fear that Israel's government wants to “permanently expel” all Palestinians from Israel, thus eliminating demands for Palestinian statehood. But truthfully what Abdullah and others really wanted is the total elimination of Israel, and the replacing of her with an islamic Palestinian state.  

 

But what's odd is that with most Palestinians being of Jordanian descent and lineage, and with the Palestinians already in Jordan being fully naturalized citizens who hold Jordanian passports, work permits, drivers licenses, etc., the truth is that Jordan is already an existing Palestinian homeland just with a different name. So exactly why doesn't Abdullah want to take his own people back into the fold? Simply, because Abdullah just doesn't care as witnessed by these words said to the German Chancellor on October 17, 2023, “This is a situation (meaning the war and statehood) that has to be handled within Gaza and the West Bank, and you don’t have to carry this out on the shoulders of others”...as in force the refuges on Jordan. Read entire article here.

Op-ed:

A Bad Resolution...An Unacceptable Solution...Peace Questionable At Best

By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots / Right Side Patriots Radio

The Op-ed posted here is my opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.com nor Google.

Friday, October 6, 2023 saw a peaceful day in the Middle East...peaceful between Israel and the Palestinians living in Gaza. On October 7, 2023...a day forever to be known as “Black Saturday”...the Iranian financed and armed terrorist organization Hamas...the governing body voted into power by the Palestinian people in 2006...broke said peace in the most horrific, barbaric, and savage of ways. Whole families were slaughtered in their sleep; women were gang raped; people were burnt alive, others were beheaded; a baby was cooked to death in an oven; and over 200 civilian hostages were taken. Blood was everywhere in a number of Kibbutzim near the Gaza border for no other reason than they were Jews...for no other reason than Iran and Hamas (a direct outshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood's Palestinian branch) wished both Israel and the Jewish people wiped from the face of the map.

And while condemnation of Hamas was worldwide at first, in time it morphed into acts akin to the lead in to the Holocaust as antisemitism once again resurfaced both here at home and abroad after Israel retaliated against the acts taken...acts not unlike those of Nazi Germany.

“Over kill” many called it as more Palestinians were killed in Israel's retaliatory strikes than were Israelis on October 7th, but unlike the victims in Israel most of the the Palestinians who died, died because they did not heed Israel's warning to vacate certain targeted areas where Hamas operatives were believed to be hiding. And while Israel always tries to keep civilian casualties to a minimum... they are the only country to warn an enemy's civilian population to vacate an area before they fire the first rocket...but unfortunately most did not resulting in a high Palestinian death toll. But the numbers cited seem to be over estimated by Gaza officials who knew Israel's goal is to completely eliminate Hamas, dare they ever try to strike Israel again.

And as Israel's offensive rightfully continues on, so too has condemnation from international communities who believe that they have a right to tell the sovereign nation of Israel what they can and cannot do no matter that it was their border alone that was breached. Israel did not initiate this war but they will end the war on their terms alone. And as antisemitism continues to rise, the “European Parliament” took it upon themselves to pass a “resolution” calling for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. 

And while they demanded two preset conditions, the fact remains that the “European Parliament” has no right dictating to Israel...nor any nation not part of the “European Union”...what they can or cannot do in both matters and time of war.

So while the “EP” made clear its support for Israel...to some degree that is...their first condition was a call for an “immediate and permanent ceasefire” with said ceasefire beginning with the “immediate and unconditional release” of all the hostages taken. And their second condition was that Hamas must be totally “dismantled”...no mention of the word “destroyed.” Word semantics maybe...an act of veiled placation more than likely. And in regards to the remaining known hostages, does anyone still believe that most or any of the hostages taken are still alive...I sadly do not.

Here are the reasons for my stating that the “EP” only supports Israel “to some degree,” with the first reason being the fact that said “resolution” also stated that its members must address and denounce what they called “the disproportionate Israeli military response, which has caused a civilian death toll on an unprecedented scale.” Denounce the death toll,..I say “no way” for the true Palestinian death toll is still unknown, and besides who is the “EP” to tell Israel what is proportionate or not, especially when many of those killed in Israel's rightful retaliatory strikes were targeted Hamas operatives and their supporters.

And second is that said “resolution” not only called for “full humanitarian access throughout the Gaza Strip;” but that the “occupation of the Palestinian territories” must end, and that the“European initiative to put the two-state solution needs to be put back on track”...as in post-haste. To all I stated I say no way...not now...not ever.

Why so? Let's start with“humanitarian aide” which must be carefully weighed as the Palestinians living in Gaza...with some referring to themselves as “Gazans”...not only willingly voted terrorists into power, but most of them supported and heralded Hamas' October 7th actions. And this was witnessed by the multitudes who gathered in Gaza's streets to welcome back their so-called “heroes” with fists and voices raised in solidarity, while they prodded and spat upon the hostages...some wounded and bleeding...as they were paraded through the streets. Those supporting barbaric savagery should be given, in my opinion, no aide at all for the very act of giving them aid allows Hamas' genocidal ideology and ensuing actions to continue on...continue on through their children...the next generation of terrorists... children indoctrinated into both hating Israel and the Jewish people almost from the time they are born.

Now as for the “European Parliament” demanding that “the occupation of the Palestinian territories (in this case Gaza) must end,” and that a “two-state solution” is the only chance for peace, here it's important to understand that technically there never has been a “Palestine” state let alone a country nor were there ever a people known as “Palestinians”...that is until then PLO leader Yassir Arafat “invented” them in the late 1960s to help push forward his radical PLO agenda. Also understand that there has been no...I repeat no...Israeli occupation of Gaza since 2005 when Israel, hoping it would help bring peace, turned Gaza over to the Palestinians who in turn voted out what was then the PLO governing body in 2006 by voting Hamas into power instead.

So how can Israel end an “occupation” that has not been in existence for almost two decades? Simply they cannot, but we can help expose the lie and hope that others learn the truth as to who the real “bad guys” are.

So what did Israel get for this Gaza gesture of peace but a continuing barrage of Hamas terrorist attacks courtesy of Iran's support. And while a “two-state solution” seems like an admirable goal, at least on paper it does...but the reality is that it's totally unattainable under the current conditions. Remember, Israel has offered Palestinian leaders numerous peace deals in the past... deals that could have resulted in Palestinian statehood...yet each offer was rejected because the Palestinians refused to lay down their weapons and acknowledge Israel's right to exist.

And now it seems they never will especially when Hamas and its supporters...including those here in the U.S...continue altering the region's history to justify their means...as in no Jewish State of Israel must exist on the land they call Palestine...land considered to be the southern part of the “Levant”... land they believe belongs to the Palestinians alone. How wrong these people are.

Here are a few historical facts, starting with the name “Palestine.” “Palestine” was first used by the Roman poet Ovid to describe a generalized region west of Mesopotamia, and later used by Roman authorities to describe an “administrative provincial category,” and nothing more.

As per the words of the Old Testament, Exodus 23:31, “I will set your border from the Red Sea to the Sea of the Philistines, and from the wilderness to the Euphrates,” was the land God promised to the Jewish people, but unfortunately what comprises Israel today is less than 5% of that which God promised. And not to be forgotten is that for over four centuries prior to the first World War, said land was part of the Turkish-ruled Ottoman Empire. And it was only after the war and the empire's collapse, that the territory the British referred to as “Palestine”...which never was an Arab nor any people's sovereign nation...was assigned by the League of Nations to Great Britain to administer to. And here via what became a “mandate,” Britain was appointed with the task of establishing a “national home for the Jewish people.”

Now let's fast forward to 1948 and the creation of what became the“Jewish State of Israel.” But first let us clear the key misconception in regards to Israel's creation... the one that Israel was given to the Jewish people as compensation for the Holocaust. This is unequivocally not true for this land had already been established as a “Jewish homeland” by the League of Nations decades before. And besides, no Arabs then, nor any of the Palestinians now, have a legitimate claim to a land that was never theirs to begin with. Now coupling that with the fact Israel is but a sliver of land surrounded by millions of acres of Arab land, you'd think their fellow Arabs would give up a small piece of land for the Palestinians to call home, or at least give them refuge, but they will not. And why...because the Arab nations know that the so-called “Palestinians“ are caste-wise at the bottom of the barrel and do most assuredly breed trouble wherever they go.

Take Egypt for example who not only shares a border with Gaza but helps Israel's blockade of Gaza. Egypt had trouble with Palestinians in the past, and fears that by accepting more into their country Hamas and other militant groups, like Islamic Jihad, would be mixed in amongst the new arrivals, never mind the influx itself would create a burden on Egypt's economy. In fact, President el-Sisi stated about the Palestinians that, “It’s important for its people to stay steadfast and exist on their own land, “ but that, “Egypt will exert its utmost efforts to alleviate their suffering.”

Also, a large Palestinian presence could again “destabilize” the Sinai region. Egypt's military rid Sinai of Hamas backed militants who previously came under the guise of being refugees, and tried to set-up bases from which to attack Israel. In fact, el-Sisi feels so strongly about this that he said of Sinai, “the presence of Palestinian militants in Sinai would again become a base for attacks on Israel. Israel would have the right to defend itself...and would strike Egyptian territory.” Remember, Israel and Egypt have been at peace since 1979, and el-Sisi does not want any trouble for Egypt, especially by those in Islamic Jihad, a direct offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood, a group Egypt has had much trouble with in the past.

And then there's Jordan, the country the Palestinians rightfully should call home. King Abdullah II (the “kinglet” as he is known to some) has stated on numerous occasions that Jordan will take in no Palestinian refugees for fear that Israel's government wants to “permanently expel” all Palestinians from Israel, thus eliminating demands for Palestinian statehood. But truthfully what Abdullah and others really wanted is the total elimination of Israel, and the replacing of her with an islamic Palestinian state.

But what's odd is that with most Palestinians being of Jordanian descent and lineage, and with the Palestinians already in Jordan being fully naturalized citizens who hold Jordanian passports, work permits, drivers licenses, etc., the truth is that Jordan is already an existing Palestinian homeland just with a different name. So exactly why doesn't Abdullah want to take his own people back into the fold? Simply, because Abdullah just doesn't care as witnessed by these words said to the German Chancellor on October 17, 2023, “This is a situation (meaning the war and statehood) that has to be handled within Gaza and the West Bank, and you don’t have to carry this out on the shoulders of others”...as in force the refuges on Jordan.

Not such unexpected words coming from the man who has yet to totally cut ties to the Muslim Brotherhood who, like he, remains somewhat in the shadows yet is committed to armed resistance against Israel and the aforementioned creation of an islamic Palestinian state. King Abdullah II, no matter his western appearance and mannerisms is, in my opinion, an islamist at heart.

And while some Arab nations do want ties with Israel, with some already stating the Israel does have a right to exist, others are still of the mindset that Middle East peace can only happen when, “from the river to the sea, and from the north to the south,” Israel and the Jewish people are no more. Thankfully, Israel does not see it that way nor do her true allies and friends. Case closed.

Copyright © 2024 / Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All rights reserved.

***************************************************************************************************

For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, The Only Path Forward.

***************************************************************************************************

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!                                             

 

Tomorrow, Tuesday, February 6th, from 7-8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'A Bad Resolution...An Unacceptable Solution...Peace Questionable At Best'; 'The Only Path Forward'; and important news of the day. Hope you can tune in to RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE' starting at 6:50 pm EST with show beginning at 7pm EST.

 

Op-ed:

Slavery's Islamic Face

By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

Slavery in America...a sad chapter in American history but a chapter in many nation's history. And while we are still dealing with slavery's ramifications here in America courtesy of those who refuse to let long abolished slavery be part of our nation's past not part of our of present or our future, these sorts still refuse to accept as fact that all peoples of all colors, nationalities, religions, and creeds have at one time or another been slaves whether they be the spoils of war or innocent victims of their country's conquest.

But for the most part the capture and bonding to slavery of the unwilling, along with the buying and selling of what amounts to being human chattel, has disappeared from the civilized world...as it should. However, there is one major corner of the world where slavery remains the norm and that is in the nations of the islamic world...both in the Middle East and in parts of Africa as well...for when the Atlantic slave trade ended the Eastern slave trade grew until it finally morphed into today's very profitable islamic slave trade.

Simply, the abolition of the Atlantic slave trade in no way led to freedom for some...it merely changed the point of origin a bit as well as the destination to which the slaves would be sent.

And while worldwide voices of opposition are raised to some degree...for no man should own another man... most, but not all, black voices here in America remain silent to the plight of their African black brothers and sisters. To them it's better to try and bilk “whitey” for reparations for long past injustices done than better the time spent trying to help fellow black victims of present day islamic slave trading. Guess in their eyes there's just no hoped for individual profit and reward in their getting involved.

But first islam itself...Qur'an 4:92 "It is not for a believer to kill a believer unless (it be) by mistake. He who hath killed a believer by mistake must set free a believing slave, and pay the blood-money to the family of the slain, unless they remit it as a charity. If he (the victim) be of a people hostile unto you, and he is a believer, then (the penance is) to set free a believing slave."

Slavery in islam is not new...especially sexual slavery...its history is long and very sordid for islam itself came into existence at a time when slavery of every kind was both accepted and widespread. And while the qur'an does reference slavery as being somewhat of the norm...just as it was at one time in both Judaism and Christianity... those two great religions went through a reformation where slavery, no matter the Biblical references, is no longer condoned. Not so in the islamic world for there has been no reformation of islam, and for the most part the islamic world lives today as it did in the 6th century when it was born...although the modern day version of the 6th century now comes replete with 21st century weapons of the most vile kind.

And know that muhammad himself bought, sold, captured, and owned slaves, and that twenty nine times slaves are mentioned in the qur'an...mentioned as a definitive distinction between a slave and a free man being the natural order of things...translating into that even today under islam, slavery, for the most part, remains an accepted practice no matter that we non-believers...we infidels...deem otherwise.

And while islamic law recognized slavery as an institution within islamic society and attempted to regulate and restrict it in various ways...the qur'an speaks of slavery being restricted to two instances alone...as in if one is captured in a war...a war that was “legal” according to the sharia...or if one is born into slavery...born as a child of two slaves. And while the qur'an also states that a “free muslim” cannot be enslaved and that conversion to islam by a non-muslim slave does not negate said person's slave status, the former part of that law has been thrown by the wayside by the likes of ISIS and such who freely enslave both their fellow muslims whether they be “free” or not as well as Christians who refuse to convert to islam.

"The trade in Yazidi women and girls has created a persistent infrastructure, with a network of warehouses where the victims are held, viewing rooms where they are inspected and marketed, and a dedicated fleet of buses used to transport them." - as per the article ISIS Enshrines a Theology of Rape in The New York Times, August 2015.

So with slavery being acceptable under qur'anic law regarding those captured during times of war...during times of so-called lawful "jihad"...slavery still technically remains illegal under the state secular laws of all muslim countries. And yet slavery still remains an important staple of modern islam especially but not limited to sex slavery...with an estimated 2,936,800 slaves in total scattered throughout the Middle East. And while it was ISIS who publicly sold an estimated 2,000+ captured Iraqi Yazidi women and young girls from the village of Kocho as sex slaves...for less than the price of a packet of cigarettes or so they claim...many other captured young Yasidi women instead became ISIS' victims of forced marriages most times to wealthy much older men...and this includes little girls as young as six years of age.

And let's not forget that these same little Yasidi girls and young women are but numbers added to ISIS' ever increasing and highly profitable commercial aspect of what amounts to sexual exploitation...otherwise known as islamic sex trafficking...where those not outwardly sold to a single buyer or into a forced marriage are sentenced instead into a lifetime of prostitution and breeding... breeding the next generation of prostitutes to serve the perverted desires of ISIS men. In fact, U.N. investigators estimate that some 7,000 young Yasidi women and girls have been forced by ISIS into sex slavery of some kind.

And not to be ignored nor diminished in any way is that while ISIS continues to sell young Yasidi women and girls, they outright slaughtered more than 5,000 Yasidi men. Now expanding beyond just the Yasidi, ISIS marks both Christian and muslim males for slavery with most of those marked being forced into both "state and non-state" armed groups...in this case being assorted ISIS aligned terrorist groups...where they become either expendable jihadi fighters or martyrs for the cause. And while some of the males might technically not be deemed slaves by ISIS condoners, young, strong, and healthy males are still forced to become laborers earning less than a dollar a day...if they're even paid at all.

But know that ISIS is just the tip of the islamic slave market for there is also Boko Haram, who since their birth in 2009, have abducted thousands of African girls and women in northeast Nigeria, including the more than 200 Chibok girls taken from their secondary school in April 2014...many of whom were turned into suicide bombers with others "deliberately impregnating" to produce the next generation of Boko Haram fighters. Now remember Michelle Obama's useless self-promoting publicity tweets, “bring back our girls”...tweets in reference to the Chibok abductions...yet barely a whisper was heard from America's black community in response...very sad indeed.

So as ISIS, Boko Haram, and other Middle Eastern and African terrorist groups now struggle somewhat to finance their what we call “terrorist operations” and what they call a “holy war against the West”...a struggle that is the direct result of U.S. and allied forces really starting to kick some islamic terrorist butt...slavery, whether it be of the hard labor or of the sexual kind, remains a welcomed big money source from which to restock their dwindling monetary islamic terrorist war chests.

“It turns out that slavery today is more profitable than I could have imagined...Profits on a per slave basis can range from a few thousand dollars to a few hundred thousand dollars a year, with total annual slavery profits estimated to be as high as $150 billion.” So says Siddharth Kara, a slavery economist and fellow of the Carr Center for Human Rights Policy at the Harvard Kennedy School, in his book Modern Slavery.

And with the islamic slavery “business” showing no signs of abating, especially not with a 20 to 30 percent overall return on the slaver's human “investment,” slavery will surely increase in the islamic world especially in islamic North Africa...black Africa...much to the West's basically looking away. And why...because Western bleeding heart's always use the same excuse for any of Africa's woes being that with most of the continent mired in poverty coupled with the sad fact of ongoing black-on-black tribal warfare...tribal savagery best left to centuries past...that this all helps to construct a ripe for islamic takeover scenario replete with sharia compliant slavery.

But dare we not forget that there's also...whether it be right or wrong...a growing black African mentality similar to that which mimics many of those residing in today's predominately black American inner-cities...a scenario that the islamists actually feed upon.

And these inner-cities are where a self-perceived lack of a "voice;" lack of an education (an education which is freely available but which some self-proclaimed victims of “whitey's” supposed injustice willingly choose not to take advantage of); lack of an intact traditional family unit (not multiple welfare children each with a different daddy); coupled with a lack of drive to economically move forward without someone else...aka the government...footing the bill; translates into some people not just accepting their sorry lot in life as their predestined norm but actually relishing in it.

Sounds a lot like islamic North Africa as well...now doesn't it.

And with this mindset now being passed down from generation to generation both here in America and in Africa as well, the excuse that poverty itself creates and breeds slavery...physical slavery in Africa, mental slavery in America...is but a lie for slavery is slavery whether it be the slavery of modern war or the all consuming memories of slavery coming from refusing to let go of the past. And Africa's supposed victimhood as well as its being ripe for islam's picking...as in its being the Middle East's easy to access warehouse of slaves...lies deep within its own governments...governments who do little to nothing of substance to help stop the islamic slaver's from taking its men and selling its women and children. And this moral abomination will continue on because of the embedded culture known as islam and its constantly reinforced theocratic/political agenda...an agenda the hopeless easily and readily accept.

Remember, while the concept of slavery has been with man almost since time began...the strong will always look for ways to enslave the weak whether it be mentally and/or physically...many of we in the West still foolishly believe that the only way to end slavery...especially islamic slavery...is to both eliminate poverty and to fight no more wars of civilizations. But nothing can be farther from the truth simply because islamic slavery is indeed an integral part of islam itself...an integral part of the war they have been fighting since 632 A.D...as well as being a part of islam's unyielding and unforgiving religious agenda...a war that we now unfortunately see ourselves as part of.

And so while both muslims and Christian men, women, and children in black Africa and in the Middle East will sadly remain the unwilling victims of the ongoing islamic slave trade...it must be noted that no matter the world's secular laws abolishing slavery...islam's modern day goal of expansion...as in the Levant...actually in and of itself created a new demand for slaves...a demand that could only be fulfilled by starting yet another holy war. And the qur'an mandated call to jihad has indeed started that very war.

Copyright @ 2018 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.

*********************************************************************************************
For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article A New House of Cards

*******************************************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!

Today, Tuesday, May 1st from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss Slavery's Islamic Face; the new Democrat Party platform; important news of the day; and a special discussion on the muslim invasion of Europe.

Hope you can tune in at:http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history
  

Op-ed:
Why America’s Jews Must Vote for Trump…No Ifs, Ands, or Buts
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots

November 8th…Election Day…is fast approaching and while the candidates are busy pandering for votes, and with each candidate playing to specific demographics at any given time promising each group what they want to hear…Hillary Clinton is promising the blacks even more ‘free stuff’ and promising the Hispanics who came here illegally that they will not only get to stay but that no wall will be built to keep more of them out…while Donald Trump is promising those of us on the right that he will build that wall and deal with the ‘muslim problem’ on day one…a good thing I might add…but lost in this shuffle of the candidate’s pandering to the blacks and Hispanics is the Jewish vote.

The Jewish vote…an important demographic often overlooked and it should not be for while Jews comprise just 2% of the American population, 90% of that 2% registered to vote make it to the polls, compared to just 74% percent of all other Americans. And when you add in that in 2013, 70% of American Jews were living in New York, California, Florida, New Jersey, Illinois, and Pennsylvania…states whose combined 167 electoral votes make up more than half of the 270 electoral votes a presidential candidate needs to win the election…the Jewish vote can very well be the votes that sway their respective states either into the red or into the blue column.

And yet with American Jews ranking at or near the top on most measures of education, income, and so-called ‘prestige’ jobs (doctors, lawyers, bankers, for example), one has to wonder why in the past they have been so committed to the Democratic Party with all its liberal leanings. And the answer to that is simply that American Jews as a whole have always been socially conscious, as in being concerned about the welfare and well-being of the underdog, because they know more than most other minority groups what it’s like to be the victim of outright hatred, discrimination, and prejudice. Remember, with liberalism being perceived by many as America’s social conscience, and with liberalism always being the voice of the Democratic Party, Jews saw being a Democrat as a comfortable fit…a fit I personally believe is and has always been misplaced and misguided in its loyalty.  

But thankfully now there is a new faction of Jewish voters who are voting Republican and doing so in fairly large numbers…as in younger Jews who do not affiliate with either party or who register as independents but who pull the Republican lever come any given Election Day. And in that group resides a large number of ‘single-issue’ Jewish voters not unlike their counterparts in the Evangelical far right whose vote is cast based solely upon the social issues…but in the case of these Jewish voters they cast their vote based upon what is best for Israel in regards to America’s foreign policy objectives. In other words, more Jews are voting Republican because of two simple words…‘Israel’ and ‘Iran’…and the lack of Democratic support for the former while they embrace the later.

Let’s start with Israel…during his two terms in office Barack HUSSEIN Obama, with Democratic support, has caused U.S. relations with Israel…our one true ally in the entirety of the Middle East…to sour…to sour to such a degree that neither he nor the Democrats…and that includes Hillary Clinton…can be trusted to stand by the Jewish state in a time of war let alone in times of peace… or what passes for peace that is. And America’s Jews are finally starting to see that a once slow stabbing of Israel in the back has now become an outright full-fledged Obama led, Hillary condoned, and Democratic supported assault not only on the Jewish people here at home…an assault not that very different from Obama's and his administration’s assault on Christians…but also an assault against the Jewish State of Israel itself…condoning instead of condemning the actions of those who wish to wipe Israel off the map.

And as more and more American Jews are starting to open their eyes to this above stated reality…a reality that is nothing less than the abandonment of Israel…it sadly becomes ever more apparent by his words and actions… and by the Democrats always voting as a bloc with him… that Barack HUSSEIN Obama, the kumbaya left, and Hillary Clinton herself are outward supporters of all things islamic…all things ranging from the Obama so welcomed Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of our government; to the appointing of persons to positions of power who are most decidedly anti-Semitic; to Obama’s unwillingness to even utter the words ‘islamic terrorism;’ to his and the Democrat’s laying out the welcome mat for more of those ‘unable to vet’ anything but Middle East refugees to come to our shores…and Hillary is all in favor of bringing them here…in fact both she and Obama want to bring them here in even higher numbers than originally announced. 

And none of that will change with a Hillary what amounts to a surrogate presidency. Things we Americans hold dear…things like individual liberties, freedom of speech, religious freedom, free enterprise, and the rule of law that promotes equal justice for all…not just a free handout for a chosen ‘who will vote for me’ few…will be abandoned to be replaced by a true socialistic welfare state with decidedly islamic leanings…as in a Hillary presidency will be Obama’s third term in office.

And as to anti-Semitic appointees that will surely continue under a Hillary presidency…just look at who her top adviser and BFF is…as in the infamous Muslim Brotherhood operative Huma Abedin. And Hillary can always keep John ‘Swiftboat’ Kerry on as her Secretary of State if she so chooses…they are good buddies after all…for he is second only to her as a world class anti-Semite... and Hillary’s having a Jewish in name only son-in-law means not a thing for many anti-Semites surround themselves with the very people they so abhor. 

And while labeling someone an anti-Semite is not something to be taken lightly, in Kerry’s and Hillary’s case the designation is quite fitting. Remember, John Kerry was the very man who publicly claimed that the expansion of Jewish settlements in the West Bank may be the very thing responsible for the continuing attacks by Palestinians on Israelis…as in Kerry’s portraying of Israel as the perpetrator and instigator against the poor and so misunderstood Palestinians (and I say that with all sarcasm intended)…misunderstood Palestinians who lob rockets into Israel on an almost daily basis. And yet has Hillary said a word condemning or calling to task the Palestinians about this…not a word to that affect has ever crossed her always lying, islamic-condoning lips and never will.

And let’s not forget that Hillary never condemned Kerry’s words pertaining to the then still in negotiations but ultimately failed peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority over the creation of a Palestinian state…a Palestinian state that Kerry, Obama, Hillary, and the Democrats called to be created out of yet another piece of the tiny sliver of land that is Israel. And with Kerry’s words being a decidedly calculated threat against Israel…a threat with words to the affect that if the then ongoing ‘framework’ peace talks between the two opposing sides failed, Israel would be the receiver of, among other things, violence, boycotts, de-legitimization, and isolation that have sadly come to fruition as Kerry, Obama, and of course Hillary, sit back and smile as they give a wink and a nod to their Democratic cohorts.

Also to be remembered is John Kerry’s fairly recent words before the Trilateral Commission mere days after PLO President Mahmoud Abbas signed what he himself called a “unity deal” with Hamas…lying hate-filled vile words…threatening words that if Israel does not “cut a deal” with the Palestinians and does not do it soon, Israel will either cease to be a Jewish state or it will become “an apartheid state.”

Yes…those were the words of our Democratic Secretary of State…threatening words that reeks of hatred for the Jewish state…hatred morphing directly into anti-Semitism for the Jewish people and for Israel. And of course nary a word to the contrary was spoken nor was a calling Kerry to task given from Hillary, Obama, or their fellow Democrats. And how Jews can still vote for Democrats or even consider voting for Hillary Clinton is beyond the scope of imagination.

And Barack HUSSEIN Obama himself…a follower of islam contrary to his saying that he’s a Christian as his actions prove otherwise…is an even bigger anti-Semite than is John Kerry. One case in point…Obama used our taxpayer dollars to fund numerous anti-Netanyahu campaigns and propaganda rhetoric during Israel's last elections and Hillary knew about this but kept her mouth shut. And let’s not forget where this administration’s and the Democratic Party’s loyalties lie in both the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and in regards to outwardly supporting anything even remotely islamic-related that goes against Israel and especially against Netanyahu himself …with the ‘very bad’ nuclear deal immediately coming to mind. Remember, BiBi warned us, in an address to Congress, that Iran could not be trusted to abide by any decision reached, and events of late with Iran circumnavigating certain parts of Obama’s ‘very bad’ deal have proven his words to be true.

Also important to remember is that Hillary Clinton was the chief architect of this ‘very bad’ deal while it was still in its infancy so in no way would she ever condemn what she gave birth to…and that means in her eyes Israel be damned.

And now because of the above stated reasons…and more…the Republican Party is rightfully seeing an influx of Jews joining the party…Jews who are bucking the long-standing tradition of Jews voting Democratic because they understand that the only chance for Israel not to be thrown to the wolves by Hillary and/or her fellow Democrats is to vote and elect Republicans to ensure Israel’s, and of course America’s, not just security but survival as well. And only by Jews voting for Donald Trump on November 8th can that very thing be accomplished. 

As to specifics as to why Jews should vote for Donald Trump…reason one, Donald Trump says that his number one priority is to dismantle Obama’s ‘very bad’ nuclear deal with Iran…Hillary Clinton not only says she supports this agreement that has, in her words, put “the lid” on Iran's nuclear program but that it keeps Israel safer. And all I can say is 'no it does not' and Hillary knows it but has willingly chosen, along with her fellow Democrats, to once again abandon both America’s Jewish community and Israel itself.

Reason two, Hillary Clinton, just like Obama, has no love for Benjamin Netanyahu and has joined with Obama in snubbing, insulting, and chastising the Israeli Prime Minister on his many trips to America. Remember back to 2010, when VP Joe Biden visited Israel at the same time Israel announced a new housing initiative…well...Hillary was furious about this…so furious that she personally called Netanyahu and read him the riot act…calling Israel an impediment to peace in the region…a phone call that was witnessed. And at AIPAC Hillary said, "Everyone has to do their part by avoiding damaging actions, including with respect to settlements," in other words screw Israel and Netanyahu.

And in 2012, Hillary Clinton…anti-Semite that she is…told the Saban Forum that Israel needed to do more to “demonstrate that it understood the pain” of the Arabs…as in Israel is the aggressor and the Palestinians are the victims. And to again jog your memory, Hillary supported Obama when he banned flights into Ben Gurion airport during the last (and always ongoing) war, held up arms shipments to Israel, and spoke of some Israeli actions in Gaza as “totally indefensible.” And Huma must have been by Hillary’s side every step of the way to cheer Hillary's words on.

Now let’s contrast this with but a few of Donald Trump’s stances on Israel and Iran…first, Trump has always been a strong defender of the Jewish state and at last year's Algemeiner Dinner, Trump proudly stated, “we love Israel 1000%!”  In fact, Donald Trump said that the U.S. will unequivocal support Israel and recognizes Jerusalem as “the eternal and indivisible capital of the Jewish state," something Hillary refuses to say. Second, Trump also commits America to "ensuring Israel maintains a qualitative military edge over all adversaries," a critical must as this tiny country is surrounded by enemies. Third, Trump has publicly called-out both Obama and Kerry for “selling out” Israel while at the same time telling the Israelis that they should keep building settlements in the West Bank as long as the Palestinians refuse to abandon terror and refuse to negotiate a peace agreement. Fourth, Trump has a positive relationship with Benjamin Netanyahu. In fact, and this is something most do not know, but in 2013, Donald Trump taped a video endorsing Netanyahu’s candidacy that was played on Israeli TV. And fifth, Trump opposes any measures intending to impose an agreement or to dictate Israel’s borders other than by Israel herself.

Bottom line, on November 8th, Jewish voters have a critical decision to make and it goes beyond just who is best to serve as President of these United States…it also crosses into the realm of who will stand by our ally Israel and who will come to her aid not if but when Iran tries to wipe her off the map. And know that person is not Hillary Clinton for there is no love for Israel or for the Jewish people within her being. Jewish voters must understand that only with Donald Trump as president does Israel have a chance of not only surviving intact, but in surviving at all…surviving in this tangible world of those working towards their goal of returning the entirety of the Middle East to the Levant…and know that in the Levant there exists no Israel at all.