By Christine Douglass-Williams / Jihad Watch
Read in browser »
Wednesday, October 31, 2018
Italy’s Salvini congratulates Bolsonaro: “Even in Brazil, the citizens have sent home the left!”
The so-called “populist” movement, which is condemned by the left as
“racist,” “Islamophobic,” “xenophobic” and the like, has been gaining
momentum in many Western countries, and now in Brazil. While Islamic
supremacists and jihadists have been expending considerable efforts to
infiltrate Western countries, they have largely depended upon Leftist
leaders, who have betrayed their nations […]
Read in browser »
Read in browser »
Today's Headlines
- VIDEO: Pittsburgh Rabbi Gets Barrage of Hate Mail From the LEFT For Welcoming President Trump to Synagogue After Massacre
- Trump’s list: 289 accomplishments in just 20 months #midterms
- “GO HOME”: U.S. deploying SEVERAL THOUSAND TROOPS to border as THREE migrant ‘caravans’ continue their march through southern Mexico
- HORRIBLE: Muslim student punches disabled senior citizen to death, leaves him to die in the street, “You deserved that”
- Why Were the 7,000 Antisemitic Incidents Under Obama Largely Ignored?
- UK: Widowed Jihadi Brides Seek Return from Syria; Include Followers of Anjem Choudary, Jihadi John
- Tunisia: Muslim woman blows herself up in Tunis city, many injured
- PLO “suspends” recognition of Israel that never was given in the first place
- American imams are preaching Jew-hatred and genocide with impunity, where’s the outrage? #Pittsburgh
- Mail Bomb Suspect Cesar Sayoc And Stormy Daniels Worked at the Same Strip Club
- More Recent Articles
- https://gellerreport.com/
Fox News First
Developing now, Wednesday, Oct. 31, 2018
- President Trump sparked debate and liberal outrage by indicating his intent to end birthright citizenship through an executive order. But Republicans point to a 1993 speech by a former top Democrat, U.S. Sen. Harry Reid, to show that Dems were once against birthright citizenship
- The U.S. Border Patrol reportedly has warned Texas landowners along the U.S.-Mexico border that armed civilians may be in the area because of the migrant caravan approaching the U.S.
- President Trump and first lady Melania Trump on Tuesday visited the Pittsburgh synagogue where 11 people were killed in a shooting massacre, and they were greeted with protests
- CNN is under fire for allowing its guests to make increasingly outrageous and irresponsible claims about Trump following last week's alleged mail bombing attempt and synagogue massacre
- Kanye West stunned observers by suggesting in a tweet that he was going to be less involved with politics
- The Indonesian jet that crashed with 189 people on board Monday may have been found early Wednesday, officials say
Tuesday, October 30, 2018
Fox News First
Developing now, Tuesday, Oct. 30, 2018
- In an exclusive, wide-ranging interview with FOX News' Laura Ingraham, President Trump embraced being a 'nationalist' and rejected the left's attempts to blame him for last week's bomb mailings and the synagogue shooting massacre
- A week before the midterm elections, FOX News' Power Rankings have shifted in two closely-watched states: Texas and New Jersey
- President Trump and first lady Melania Trump are scheduled to visit Pittsburgh on Tuesday to offer comfort after the synagogue massacre that left 11 people dead
- A second caravan of Central American migrants crossed from Guatemala into Mexico on Monday as U.S. officials announced 5,200 troops would be deployed to the southern border. Trump told FOX News the migrants were 'wasting their time.'
- Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation is said to be entering a critical phase as his team is expected to announce its findings shortly after the midterms
- State Department spokeswoman - and former FOX News host - Heather Nauert is a leading candidate to replace Nikki Haley as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, sources told FOX News
Today, Tuesday, October 30th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss their Special Report: 'The Coming Invasion'; and important news of the day.
Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political- Radio#history ...or on Tune-In at: https://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/
Op-ed:
It's an Invasion Not a Caravan
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
We've always known an October surprise would be
coming...a surprise orchestrated by the Democrats who are desperate for
something...for anything...to turn the midterms expected “Red Tide”
blue. And now lo and behold a walking mass of humanity suddenly appears out of nowhere all in an
attempt to force President Trump into a corner...a corner they hope he
cannot escape from unscathed...damned forever by the media for whatever
he does or does not do.
And that October surprise was an “invasion”...a caravan the media calls it...a caravan that is anything but. Started in Honduras and being joined by mostly young men from El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and now being reported a scattering of Middle Eastern young men too, know that all those walking to our border are anything but refugees. And why...because a “refugee” is defined as, “a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster,” and an “asylum seeker” is someone defined as, “a person who has left their home country as a political refugee and is seeking asylum in another.”
Liberals would have us believe that those who make up the caravan
currently heading for the U.S. border are a collection of “refugees” and
“asylum seekers,” but that is far from the truth. What is heading our
way by the thousands...and with a second wave now being formed... is an
“invasion”...and there are ways to tell the difference.
First, nobody has forced any of these people to “flee” their own countries or to seek asylum elsewhere. Were that really the case, there are plenty of countries surrounding their countries of origin where such people could travel, and for that matter Mexico would be a quicker and closer destination.
Certainly socialism, with its built-in oppression and economic disasters would drive people away, but were that the case with the caravan why come to a country in which the only political party rolling out the welcome mat is championing socialist candidates? Wouldn’t that be the political equivalent of leaping from the fire into the proverbial frying pan knowing all the while that the party of welcome will force you to jump back into the fire?
Second, “asylum seekers” and “refugees” do not march more than 1,700
miles towards a new home based upon the idea of a new life with more
opportunities while carrying the flags of the countries from which they
are supposedly fleeing or from which they seek asylum.
Furthermore, while on your journey to the land of promise and opportunity neither a “refugee” nor the “seekers of asylum” would exhibit such decided disrespect toward the country of their destination as burning the flag of that country...the very country in which they supposedly hope will welcome them with open arms.
Invaders, however, would do all of those things and would further not care an iota about the destination country’s laws.
True “asylum seekers” and “refugees” also do not amass in groups of
10,000 or more and embark on a 1,700 mile trek with camera and media
crews lined up to document the event nor do they embark without any way or means of sustaining
themselves while on their long trek...but that is exactly what this supposed caravan has done. Real “refugees” and real “asylum seekers” do respect
the laws of the country of their destination and they seek permission
to stay, hoping to be granted such an opportunity.
Invaders, on the other hand, demand entrance, have no respect for the laws of their destination country, and rely on intimidation through numbers to force their way into a country.
In fact, by liberal definition, Genghis Khan was a “refugee” or an “asylum seeker,” who immigrated to one country after another.
The difference between Genghis Kahn’s mongrel forces and this caravan are simple...Khan stole whatever he needed along the way to finance his “invasion,” while this caravan is being financed by outside entities. Somebody or some entity is funding the caravan and providing those in it with food, water, and in some cases transportation, and we suggest they're paying the families of those in the caravan for the services of their husbands and sons.
“For the services of their fathers and sons”...true words that can be
seen by the very makeup of the caravan itself...an “invasion”
actually for there is not a camel in sight. And also not in sight is
women and children save for a few well placed for photo-ops within the
invading masses of healthy and strong mostly young men. And with many an
angry fist raised in the air demanding what they say is their right to
enter our country, these folks most assuredly are anything but
“refugees.” Lured here by the Democrats promise of lots of “free stuff”
they now march 7000+ strong with flags of their home countries held high
with pride, as they stop along the way to set fire to our beloved stars
and stripes...the very symbol of freedom true refugees claim they want.
Yet more times than not their violent actions prove all they want is
the aforementioned Democrats promised “free stuff,” and all they have to
do in return is give the Democrats their vote.
So with our border drawing ever near the question that remains paramount above all else is exactly who is not only feeding but funding this mass “invasion” of the uneducated and angry all with their hands out.
“In Honduras, the government wants to minimize why people are leaving
— they know they are going to leave and they want to say they are doing
so because of lies and the opposition, not the conditions that they
created.” So said ex-Honduran congressional lawmaker and radio host
Bartolo Fuentes...the very man who is ground zero of this current
“invasion”...the very man who coordinated logistics back in September
with small groups of folks seeking to make the risky trek north.
Claiming the initial group was comprised of just 200 people but that
after a television report on HCH (the Honduran news channel) it
“inspired others” to form “caravans” of their own...including one of
about about 1,000 people...and then to join up and merge together with
others making the dangerous trip north.
And while Fuentes claims that “No one expected this human avalanche,” he is denying claims made by a reporter that it was he who promised to pay what he called “migrants” food and transportation costs. And while his words hold some truth...he might have helped fund or helped to secure funds...for the original group of 200, but in no way did this one man fund an “invasion” of the scope it is now...an “invasion” just about 1,000 miles away from our southern border.
So if not Bartolo Fuentes than who could fund such a mass of humanity now threatening to breech what should be our sovereign southern border?
Only one name comes to mind...George Soros...the very man who is
spending billions of dollars to shift the world’s population to “brown”
as he works to spread his ever so vile agenda across the globe. Nazi eugenics of
sorts, but minus the overt butchery and savagery of course.
And know that while George Soros is not directly funneling money...as in he's not writing a personal check...to keep this current “invasion” moving ever forward, he certainly is doing so through a backdoor if you will for we know that Soros is directly connected to big time leftist immigration sorts. And it's believed he has already funded past caravans, in fact according to a May report in WND (World News Daily) regarding a previous caravan...“the caravan was organized by a group called Pueblo Sin Fronteras, [b]ut the effort is supported by the coalition CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project.” And what is CARA...it's a uniting of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network (CLIN), the American Immigration Council (AIC), the Refugee and Immigration Center for Education and Legal Services (RICELS) and the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)...all now joined together under the acronym CARA.
And guess who directly funded then and still funds now these specific groups
and their banner coalition CARA... George Soros’ Open Society Foundation
(OSF)...a foundation with an estimated $19.59 billion endowment used to
fund “civil society” groups and who states on their web page that their
goal is to create, “vibrant and tolerant democracies whose governments
are accountable to their citizens”...in other words they want to create
“mob rule.” And that goes hand-in-hand with Pueblo Sin Fronteras' Initiative to give preferential treatment to migrants over that of a
county's citizens. And with Soros' OSF funding CARA, it's CARA who is now
believed to be funding this current 7000+ “invasion,” which actually makes
perfect sense for supporting an “invasion” of this magnitude requires
big money...and Soros' OSF surely has big money...big money not only
needed to feed this mass of humanity but big money to pay them to keep
going forward if they waiver and want to return home.
And while in a recent interview with the Washington Post, Vice President Mike Pence not only defended President Trump’s belief that Middle Eastern men are part of this newest caravan, but stated that Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández told him that the caravan was being financed by the Venezuelan government. But this counters what reporters traveling with the caravan are saying for they see no signs of Venezuelan involvement nor of Middle Eastern men. And while that might or might not turn out to be true, we still believe it's George Soros' feet as to where the blame and the funding lies.
But no matter the source of funding or the Democrat's shadow lurking
over the caravan, the fact remains from violence they came, with
violence they march, as these invaders have threatened violence if we
don't let them in. And this is why President Trump has rightfully called
this caravan an “assault on the United States.”
And to that affect, last week President Trump, via the Pentagon, ordered 800 members of the U.S. military to our southern border...a move many pundits and certainly liberals view as unconstitutional. They are right, but only in a narrow scope of things.
The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act bans the use of the military as domestic law enforcement, and in that narrow scope the military could not be sent by the president to the border...but what we’re dealing with in this case is far from “domestic law enforcement.” What we’re dealing with is an “invasion” by international entities, but there is a much bigger problem for President Trump’s critics where the Posse Comitatus Act is concerned...
It doesn’t exist.
That’s correct...there is no such thing as the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. What we have is a Posse Comitatus Policy, which was in fact a simple statement within an 1878 army appropriations bill. And it may well come as a surprise to some that the policy was actually initiated by Democrats and meant to end funding for the U.S. army with regard to keeping the peace and maintaining open and fair elections in our former confederate states.
In that light, it is no wonder that today’s liberals are citing Posse Comitatus as a way to help ensure the prospect of future illegal aliens voting for Democrats.
That said, President Trump or for that matter any president, does have the authority to send our troops to the border, especially in a time of a national emergency of which a foreign “invasion” most clearly constitutes.
To be clear, back in the late 1870’s Republicans managed to include language into the Posse Comitatus policy that allowed the military to be deployed as law enforcement when “expressly authorized by the Constitution or act of Congress.” This also is being cited by liberals and pundits as a reason why President Trump cannot send our troops to the border...they claim it must be authorized by Congress.
That alone would be enough for the president to authorize sending our military to the border at this time, but for those who still claim it is unconstitutional, allow us to provide the Constitutional basis for presidential authorization.
It is found in Section IV, Article IV of the U.S. Constitution which
promised protection against “invasion” or domestic insurrection and thus
justifies the use of the military as domestic law enforcement. And if
that’s not clear enough, consider 8 U.S.C. § 1182 which is far too long to be
reproduced here and yet contains several parts that deal with exactly
what’s happening right now, including this specific language:
(7) Documentation requirements
(A) Immigrants
(i) In general Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, any immigrant at the time of application for admission—
(I)
who is not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing identification card, or other valid entry document required by this chapter, and a valid unexpired passport, or other suitable travel document, or document of identity and nationality if such document is required under the regulations issued by the Attorney General under section 1181(a) of this title, or
(II)
whose visa has been issued without compliance with the provisions of section 1153 of this title, is inadmissible.
Also included in 8 U.S.C. § 1182 is this: “Whenever the President
finds that the entry of any aliens or any class of aliens into the
United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United
States, he may by proclamation, and for such period a she shall deem
necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as
immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any
restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”
While we are calling this caravan as we see it...an “invasion”...it would be incumbent upon President Trump to identify it as such for the sake of legal authorization to use the military to repel it, which begs the question...how is “invasion” defined?
The very definition of “invasion” is as follows: “An incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity,” or as “An unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.”
As the United States is indeed the domain of U.S. citizens and this caravan constitutes a planned “incursion by a large number of people,”
it seems to clearly fit the definition of “invasion.” And as we
previously stated, illegal aliens do not come here to add to our society
either culturally or economically...in fact they are bleeding our
nation dry. The cost to our taxpayers is staggering as it is, with U.S.
taxpayers funding illegal aliens to the tune of some $116 billion
dollars every year...that’s what’s in it for members of the caravan. And that's money down the drain not going to American citizens...not going to our veterans.
For liberals, the expense of funding this caravan is worth it in votes, as those getting "free stuff" will always vote for the party that vows to maintain their "free stuff."
The fact is that 66% of the bill for illegal aliens, such as those traveling in this so-called caravan, is borne by local and state economies. And as their coffers strain to the breaking point and their citizen residents rise up against increasing property, sales, and excise taxes, liberals will be right there to promise a bailout, thus making those states as beholding to liberals as are to the illegal aliens themselves.
Americans, whether by local, state, or federal taxes, are being economically raped by illegal aliens as it is, and liberals want to add more of them into the mix. To say it is unsustainable would be a gross understatement, and it would be criminal to not protect our citizens, our state, local and federal economies or our southern border with military force if need be.
If need be...for these are folks too cowardly to stay home and fight
to set their home countries free choosing instead to invade ours with
violence if need be. But then maybe their threat of violence does need to be
met with physical force...as in armed American troops stationed at the border...as cutting off foreign-aid funding to their said countries is not enough...for no “invasion” has ever been stopped by
diplomacy alone or by a cutting off of funds... after all...where there's a
will there's always a way. And we all know what needs to be done whether
we outwardly say it or not for these folks have no right to be
here...we are not now nor should we ever be the world's dumping ground
for folks who knowingly and willingly make a mockery of our judicial
system and laws.
These folks are laughing at us as they relish in abusing what they think is their “right to asylum,” and the world is laughing along with them as we are really doing nothing of substance to stop this “invasion,” and it's all because we are not standing united as one.
Make no mistake, if actions are not taken now to stop this
“invasion”...and remember the Democrats are also using family separations and
Trump’s rightfully harsh anti-illegal immigration stance in general as a prime ploy to get out the Democrat vote...we could very will see a “Blue Wave” in
November as President Trump will unfortunately be perceived as weak.
These invaders have openly admitted their intention to cross into the U.S. illegally and with us having any idea who these people really are, we are facing a serious national security threat. Now more than ever we need President Trump to take matters into his own hands and lock our southern border down until we either fix our currently...thanks of course to the Democrats...broken immigration system or at the very least enforce the laws already on the books.
We cannot say it any plainer than that.
Copyright © 2018 Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots / All rights reserved.
*************************************************************************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Today, Tuesday, October 30th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss their Special Report: 'The Coming Invasion'; and important news of the day.
Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political- Radio#history ...or on Tune-In at: https://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/
It's an Invasion Not a Caravan
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
We've always known an October surprise would be
coming...a surprise orchestrated by the Democrats who are desperate for
something...for anything...to turn the midterms expected “Red Tide”
blue. And now lo and behold a walking mass of humanity suddenly appears out of nowhere all in an
attempt to force President Trump into a corner...a corner they hope he
cannot escape from unscathed...damned forever by the media for whatever
he does or does not do.And that October surprise was an “invasion”...a caravan the media calls it...a caravan that is anything but. Started in Honduras and being joined by mostly young men from El Salvador, Guatemala, Nicaragua, and now being reported a scattering of Middle Eastern young men too, know that all those walking to our border are anything but refugees. And why...because a “refugee” is defined as, “a person who has been forced to leave their country in order to escape war, persecution, or natural disaster,” and an “asylum seeker” is someone defined as, “a person who has left their home country as a political refugee and is seeking asylum in another.”
First, nobody has forced any of these people to “flee” their own countries or to seek asylum elsewhere. Were that really the case, there are plenty of countries surrounding their countries of origin where such people could travel, and for that matter Mexico would be a quicker and closer destination.
Certainly socialism, with its built-in oppression and economic disasters would drive people away, but were that the case with the caravan why come to a country in which the only political party rolling out the welcome mat is championing socialist candidates? Wouldn’t that be the political equivalent of leaping from the fire into the proverbial frying pan knowing all the while that the party of welcome will force you to jump back into the fire?
Furthermore, while on your journey to the land of promise and opportunity neither a “refugee” nor the “seekers of asylum” would exhibit such decided disrespect toward the country of their destination as burning the flag of that country...the very country in which they supposedly hope will welcome them with open arms.
Invaders, however, would do all of those things and would further not care an iota about the destination country’s laws.
Invaders, on the other hand, demand entrance, have no respect for the laws of their destination country, and rely on intimidation through numbers to force their way into a country.
In fact, by liberal definition, Genghis Khan was a “refugee” or an “asylum seeker,” who immigrated to one country after another.
The difference between Genghis Kahn’s mongrel forces and this caravan are simple...Khan stole whatever he needed along the way to finance his “invasion,” while this caravan is being financed by outside entities. Somebody or some entity is funding the caravan and providing those in it with food, water, and in some cases transportation, and we suggest they're paying the families of those in the caravan for the services of their husbands and sons.
So with our border drawing ever near the question that remains paramount above all else is exactly who is not only feeding but funding this mass “invasion” of the uneducated and angry all with their hands out.
And while Fuentes claims that “No one expected this human avalanche,” he is denying claims made by a reporter that it was he who promised to pay what he called “migrants” food and transportation costs. And while his words hold some truth...he might have helped fund or helped to secure funds...for the original group of 200, but in no way did this one man fund an “invasion” of the scope it is now...an “invasion” just about 1,000 miles away from our southern border.
So if not Bartolo Fuentes than who could fund such a mass of humanity now threatening to breech what should be our sovereign southern border?
Only one name comes to mind...George Soros...the very man who is
spending billions of dollars to shift the world’s population to “brown”
as he works to spread his ever so vile agenda across the globe. Nazi eugenics of
sorts, but minus the overt butchery and savagery of course.And know that while George Soros is not directly funneling money...as in he's not writing a personal check...to keep this current “invasion” moving ever forward, he certainly is doing so through a backdoor if you will for we know that Soros is directly connected to big time leftist immigration sorts. And it's believed he has already funded past caravans, in fact according to a May report in WND (World News Daily) regarding a previous caravan...“the caravan was organized by a group called Pueblo Sin Fronteras, [b]ut the effort is supported by the coalition CARA Family Detention Pro Bono Project.” And what is CARA...it's a uniting of the Catholic Legal Immigration Network (CLIN), the American Immigration Council (AIC), the Refugee and Immigration Center for Education and Legal Services (RICELS) and the American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA)...all now joined together under the acronym CARA.
And while in a recent interview with the Washington Post, Vice President Mike Pence not only defended President Trump’s belief that Middle Eastern men are part of this newest caravan, but stated that Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernández told him that the caravan was being financed by the Venezuelan government. But this counters what reporters traveling with the caravan are saying for they see no signs of Venezuelan involvement nor of Middle Eastern men. And while that might or might not turn out to be true, we still believe it's George Soros' feet as to where the blame and the funding lies.
And to that affect, last week President Trump, via the Pentagon, ordered 800 members of the U.S. military to our southern border...a move many pundits and certainly liberals view as unconstitutional. They are right, but only in a narrow scope of things.
The 1878 Posse Comitatus Act bans the use of the military as domestic law enforcement, and in that narrow scope the military could not be sent by the president to the border...but what we’re dealing with in this case is far from “domestic law enforcement.” What we’re dealing with is an “invasion” by international entities, but there is a much bigger problem for President Trump’s critics where the Posse Comitatus Act is concerned...
That’s correct...there is no such thing as the 1878 Posse Comitatus Act. What we have is a Posse Comitatus Policy, which was in fact a simple statement within an 1878 army appropriations bill. And it may well come as a surprise to some that the policy was actually initiated by Democrats and meant to end funding for the U.S. army with regard to keeping the peace and maintaining open and fair elections in our former confederate states.
In that light, it is no wonder that today’s liberals are citing Posse Comitatus as a way to help ensure the prospect of future illegal aliens voting for Democrats.
That said, President Trump or for that matter any president, does have the authority to send our troops to the border, especially in a time of a national emergency of which a foreign “invasion” most clearly constitutes.
To be clear, back in the late 1870’s Republicans managed to include language into the Posse Comitatus policy that allowed the military to be deployed as law enforcement when “expressly authorized by the Constitution or act of Congress.” This also is being cited by liberals and pundits as a reason why President Trump cannot send our troops to the border...they claim it must be authorized by Congress.
That alone would be enough for the president to authorize sending our military to the border at this time, but for those who still claim it is unconstitutional, allow us to provide the Constitutional basis for presidential authorization.
It is found in Section IV, Article IV of the U.S. Constitution which
promised protection against “invasion” or domestic insurrection and thus
justifies the use of the military as domestic law enforcement. And if
that’s not clear enough, consider 8 U.S.C. § 1182 which is far too long to be
reproduced here and yet contains several parts that deal with exactly
what’s happening right now, including this specific language:(7) Documentation requirements
(A) Immigrants
(i) In general Except as otherwise specifically provided in this chapter, any immigrant at the time of application for admission—
(I)
who is not in possession of a valid unexpired immigrant visa, reentry permit, border crossing identification card, or other valid entry document required by this chapter, and a valid unexpired passport, or other suitable travel document, or document of identity and nationality if such document is required under the regulations issued by the Attorney General under section 1181(a) of this title, or
(II)
whose visa has been issued without compliance with the provisions of section 1153 of this title, is inadmissible.
While we are calling this caravan as we see it...an “invasion”...it would be incumbent upon President Trump to identify it as such for the sake of legal authorization to use the military to repel it, which begs the question...how is “invasion” defined?
The very definition of “invasion” is as follows: “An incursion by a large number of people or things into a place or sphere of activity,” or as “An unwelcome intrusion into another's domain.”
For liberals, the expense of funding this caravan is worth it in votes, as those getting "free stuff" will always vote for the party that vows to maintain their "free stuff."
The fact is that 66% of the bill for illegal aliens, such as those traveling in this so-called caravan, is borne by local and state economies. And as their coffers strain to the breaking point and their citizen residents rise up against increasing property, sales, and excise taxes, liberals will be right there to promise a bailout, thus making those states as beholding to liberals as are to the illegal aliens themselves.
Americans, whether by local, state, or federal taxes, are being economically raped by illegal aliens as it is, and liberals want to add more of them into the mix. To say it is unsustainable would be a gross understatement, and it would be criminal to not protect our citizens, our state, local and federal economies or our southern border with military force if need be.
These folks are laughing at us as they relish in abusing what they think is their “right to asylum,” and the world is laughing along with them as we are really doing nothing of substance to stop this “invasion,” and it's all because we are not standing united as one.
These invaders have openly admitted their intention to cross into the U.S. illegally and with us having any idea who these people really are, we are facing a serious national security threat. Now more than ever we need President Trump to take matters into his own hands and lock our southern border down until we either fix our currently...thanks of course to the Democrats...broken immigration system or at the very least enforce the laws already on the books.
We cannot say it any plainer than that.
Copyright © 2018 Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots / All rights reserved.
*************************************************************************************************************************************
Today, Tuesday, October 30th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss their Special Report: 'The Coming Invasion'; and important news of the day.
Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political- Radio#history ...or on Tune-In at: https://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)