By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots / Right Side Patriots Radio
With the presidential election being
less then a month away we still see the violence and mayhem
continuing on unabated in Democrat controlled cities even while the
media seems to be downplaying it. And now with those on the left
mimicking the excuse used by BLM that said violence and mayhem is but “ opportunistic vandalism” and that most BLM protests
are peaceful in nature, even more lies are being added to the lies
already spewed that Black Live Matter is not an anarchist group and
therefore should not and must not be labeled as such. And it's my
opinion that BLM is indeed not only a Marxist based, agendized,
anarchist group, but a group whose hierarchy plans and coordinates
said riots and mayhem while sitting back, as most cowards do, paying
others do their dirty work. Simply, BLM along with Antifa, should
rightfully be designated as domestic terrorist groups.
Biden’s Flabbergasting Response to Court Packing Question Should Concern Voters
Reagan McCarthy / Townhall Tipsheet
Following Wednesday night’s vice presidential debate,
former Vice President Joe Biden and Senator Kamala Harris campaigned in
Arizona. After Sen. Harris dodged a simple question about “court
packing” during her debate with Vice President Mike Pence, Biden
declined to take a stance on the fringe issue that is gaining momentum
within the Democratic party.
Asked his opinion on expanding the size of the Supreme Court, which
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) has not taken off the table,
Biden said that Americans will know his opinion after the general
election.
Biden
called the question about "court packing" a "distraction." Though the
former vice president continually ducks the straightforward question,
his running mate previously said she was “absolutely open to” packing the high court with more than nine justices.
DESTROYED: Tons of Trump mail-in ballot applications SHREDDED in back of tractor trailer headed for Pennsylvania
By Geller Report Staff
Mail-in ballots are a disaster. They represent the biggest threat to
President Trump and election integrity. The POTUS better have lawyered
up because this election will be contested if it’s close. Vote in person
if you want your vote to count.
A man in Indiana took video of a tractor trailer full of shredded
mail-in ballot application mailers with Trump’s face on them that were
destined for Pennsylvania. Here are the two videos he recorded:
RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!Today, Friday, October 9th from 7 to 9pm EST,RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'Designation Needed'; 'The Ultimate Denouncing of Racism'; and important news of
the day.
Hope you can tune in to RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTSon
our website rspradio1.com. Click 'LISTEN
LIVE' starting
at 6:50 pm EST with the show beginning at 7pm EST.
In a debate that was both contentious but also cooled down by several degrees compared to last week's presidential debate, Vice President Mike Pence and Democratic presidential nominee Sen. Kamala Harris squared off Wednesday night on topics ranging from the pandemic to health care to the USMCA.
Pence and Harris, D-Calif., one of whom no matter
what will be the vice president to the oldest president of the United
States ever elected by January, met in what will be their only
face-to-face public appearance of the election. Along with their
convention speeches, the Wednesday debate will likely be their
highest-profile moments of the general election.
Here are the top five moments of the vice-presidential debate.
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on Right Side Patriots Radio
With the presidential election being
less then a month away we still see the violence and mayhem
continuing on unabated in Democrat controlled cities even while the
media seems to be downplaying it. And now with those on the left
mimicking the excuse used by BLM that said violence and mayhem is but “ opportunistic vandalism” and that most BLM protests
are peaceful in nature, even more lies are being added to the lies
already spewed that Black Live Matter is not an anarchist group and
therefore should not and must not be labeled as such. And it's my
opinion that BLM is indeed not only a Marxist based, agendized,
anarchist group, but a group whose hierarchy plans and coordinates
said riots and mayhem while sitting back, as most cowards do, paying
others do their dirty work. Simply, BLM along with Antifa, should
rightfully be designated as domestic terrorist groups.
So why aren't they both designated as
such...as usual because of partisan based rhetoric coupled with their
shared overtly leftist Democrat-Socialist party enablers. Remember
back to July 18, 2019 when Senate Resolution 279 was first proposed,
a resolution that called not only for groups and organizations acting
under the banner of Antifa to be designated as domestic terrorist
organizations, but also called for the “Federal Government to
redouble its efforts, using all available and appropriate tools, to
combat the spread of all forms of domestic terrorism, including White
supremacist terrorism”...well
that resolution basically went nowhere because of word semantics
regarding Section 802 of the Patriot Act.
And while the Patriot Act does address
foreign based terrorism (think jihad here)...domestic
terrorism...as in home grown terrorism...would basically be,
if the act were to be amended, an expansion of foreign terrorism that
would now include domestic terrorism as meaning (like with foreign
terrorism) any person or group who has engaged in an act
“dangerous to human life” that is in violation of the
criminal laws of a given state or of the United States itself. Now
couple that with domestic terrorism then designated to mean (again
like with foreign terrorism) “an act intended to intimidate or
coerce the U.S. civilian population; influence the policy of our
government by intimidation or coercion; and/or affects the conduct of
our government via mass destruction, assassination or kidnapping,”
and one would clearly see how the ongoing actions of both Antifa and
Black Lives Matter truly do fit the definition of a terrorist
organizations as both groups share similar ideologies and objectives.
But what's not so easy to understand is
the Democrats reasoning behind not giving both groups the much
needed domestic terrorist label. Saying that Antifa...founded in
Germany and the U.K. during the anti-fascist movements of the 1920s
and 1930s, Antifa as we know it today came to the U.S. in the 1970s
and 1980s as an anti-fascist action and left-wing political movement.
And while Antifa is not a “formal organization” per se, as
it does not have a formal leader, specific membership roles, or a
defined centralized structure, it is an array of autonomous and
diffuse localized groups that are indeed organized, and who have
fairly large followings on social media, an example of which is the
Rose City Antifa in Portland, Oregon who has played a key role in
that city's ongoing violence.
Also, Antifa’s goal according to
those members, if you will, who have spoken to the media is to both
deny who they consider to be fascists or far-right activists a
platform from which to speak as well as to “dehood Klansmen”
even if it takes violence to do so...with legalized policy reform
be damned.
And the group...or the sometimes called movement...we commonly
refer to as Black Lives Matter is actually an “umbrella
coalition” comprised of 150 different organizations, including
the Black Lives Matter Network. And it's this network which demands
"reparations for the wealth extracted from our communities
through environmental racism, slavery, food apartheid, and housing
discrimination," and who pushes forward the aforementioned
“opportunistic vandalism” nonsense as being not only a
justifiable excuse to burn, loot, and terrorize, but that it's an
owed to them form of reparations for the injustice of slavery...an
injustice that they themselves were never party to.
But the truth is
that the actions of Black Lives Matter have shown their message to be based more
upon continuing the generational “gimme-gimme, you owe me”
mentality used to keep their own people in line. And why
so?Simply, because that allows BLM to continue with their instilling of a misplaced sense of entitlement within
poor inner city black communities by their feeding upon an unnatural
fear of a self-perceived white enemy, while at the same time
allowing their leaders to grow richer and politically more powerful
as their group's numbers increase.
So while Black Lives Matter does say in
its online mission statement that “we stand againststate-sanctioned violence and anti-Black racism," those
words are but divert-and-deflect propaganda material for while BLM
says one thing they have proven almost daily to do just the opposite,
as in actually advocating for violence specifically against white
males and the police.To BLM
and their ilk, state sponsored violence targets black people alone no
matter that the very concept they use to feed their hate does not
really exist. And the fact is that a big part of the violence being
witnessed today is actually courtesy of BLMencouragingtheir own people tobothcontinue
toset American cities on fire and to continue the
rioting until their self-serving objectives are met.
And the other obvious sponsor of
violence is the Antifa sorts what with their supporters sharing both
common protest tactics and specific key targets with Black Lives Matter
as well as their believing that violence, mayhem, and terror tactics...including military-style tactics...are the much needed tools by which to
combat what they consider to be the alt-right...as in far-right
extremists and white nationalist groups they erroneously say have
grown stronger, more vocal, and more defiant under the presidency of
Donald J. Trump. Guess they willingly ignore the fact that almost all
the racial unrest going on today began courtesy of Barack Hussein
Obama's “If I had a son...” rhetoric.
In other words, those supporting and
taking part in either BLMs and Antifa's thought processes and what
amounts to terror driven theatrics are of the same mindset for both
see the government and white people as a common enemy...an enemy that
must be eliminated through any means possible including violence if
need be. And both Antifa and BLM are indeed the perpetrators of the
still ongoing riots and mayhem...actions now peppered with murder if
need be...vile actions that the Democrat party along with its
hierarchy still vehemently refuse to condemn, and we all know that if
one does not condemn one surely does condone.
So as we continue to bear
witness to over one hundred days and nights of violence, we don't
need the media, the Democrats, BLM or Antifa telling us that what we
see going on with our own eyes in major Democrat controlled cities is
simply nothing but “opportunistic vandalism.” And we surely don't
need Trump-hating Democrats with an agenda telling us that there is
no legal authority that would ever allow either group to be
designated as domestic terrorists. Saying that to do so would
automatically lead to First Amendment challenges, the fact is that
even if by some chance the First Amendment did offer either group a
modicum of protection as per their right to “free speech”
and to “address grievances,” both groups have outwardly
and continuously violated the right of “peaceably assembling.”
And with both groups having committing
tangible crimes...crimes actually caught on tape and born witnessed
to...crimes we still see happening every night on the news... leaves
both BLM and Antifa open to abject criminal charges if nothing
else...criminal charges that neither group has yet to be prosecuted
for. But hopefully that too will soon change for while the RICO law
was designed specifically to prosecute organized crime, the courts
have allowed RICO to be applied somewhat more broadly, thus
allowing BLM and Antifa to fall under the description of being RICOcharged.
But
the overall fact remains that both entities, whether they be an
organized group or not, do need to be classified as domestic
terrorists, after all their actions demand it. And while neither
Black Lives Matter nor Antifa fits the current federal definition of
a terrorist organization nor has either been designated as such on
the State Department list of foreign terrorist organizations, there still remains an important
legal question that must be answered in order to do so...with the
question being do either of the group's acts of violence rise to
crimes of terrorism as defined in the Patriot Act? I believe they do
no matter that the definition includes the need for specific criteria
to have been carried out as in if said group(s) have engaged in
planning and preparations for possible future acts of terrorism
and/or if they retain the capability and intent to carry out such
acts in the future.
And
while we all do know the answer is most assuredly yes on both accounts,
there currently exists no legal process for designating any domestic,
home grown group as a terrorist organization...the must needed first
step. Therefore, applying the so much needed moniker domestic terrorist, as it
exists now, to either Antifa or BLM becomes but a non-legally binding
catch phrase at best when what is truly needed is an actual legally applied
designation. And besides, attorneys on the left would raise a
constitutional ruckus that BLMs and Antifa's actions are both
protected speech and assembly no matter that they sometimes, actually
that they most times, seem to turn violent, thus opening up the
possibly for both short-and long-term political implications that we
have no specific frame of reference by which to gauge right from
wrong constitutionally wise. This alone would justify political
adversaries concerns that such a designation has a great potential
for abuse.
So
while I personally believe that President Trump should indeed declare
both groups as domestic terrorist organizations...for truthfully that
is what they are designation or no designation...he needs to do so
with the letter of the law solidly and irrefutably behind him. After
all, we are a nation of laws and it's that very concept of law that
has made and kept America both exceptional and strong.
***************************************************************************************************************************************** For
more political commentary please visit my RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS
partner Craig Andresen's blog The
National Patriot
to read his latest article,The Ultimate Denouncing of Racism.
Tomorrow, Friday, October 9th from 7 to 9pm EST,RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'Designation Needed'; 'The Ultimate Denouncing of Racism'; and important news of
the day.
Hope you can tune in to RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTSon
our newly launched website rspradio1.com. Click 'LISTEN
LIVE' starting
at 6:50 pm EST with the show beginning at 7pm EST.
