Sunday, September 20, 2026
Just a Thought
Thursday, September 17, 2026
Just a Thought
Tuesday, May 19, 2026
Fact Three: the MAGA concept will still drive the discourse in 2028, but with an unexpected twist in that the one deemed by most to be Trump's presidential heir apparent...meaning Vice President JD Vance...might not be that heir after all. Why so...because (I believe) two better candidates have already been spoken about in Republican political circles, as in Florida's Governor Ron DeSantis, and our current “Secretary of State” Marco Rubio.
Monday, May 18, 2026
While the November midterms are fast approaching, and with Republicans needing to keep both the House and Senate so that President Trump's last two years in office can truly bring to fruition his “Make America Great Again” agenda...aka MAGA...I truly believe it's never too early to also start thinking ahead to the 2028 Presidential Election.
And while some folks say let's get through the midterm election first, I respectfully disagree if for no other reason than the fact that there are no absolutes in politics. After all, it's not a given that Republicans won't see the Democrats controlling the House and/or the Senate in 2026, nor is it a given that Republicans will hold onto the presidency in 2028.
And in regards to the presidency, remember this very important fact...as per the 22nd Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1951, a U.S. president can only serve two terms in office whether said terms be consecutive or with a break between each term. Simply, this amendment is the safeguard against the concentration of power in the executive branch.
Donald Trump cannot legally run for the presidency again nor can he run for vice-president no matter what anyone says. Why so...because Amendment 12 clearly states that “no person constitutionally ineligible to the office of President shall be eligible to that of Vice-President,” thus eliminating any outside chance of Trump ever becoming a vice-presidential candidate, not that he even wants that position. Why so... because Trump could become president again...for a third term...if something were to happen to the then sitting president where he was unable to finish out his term.
So
where does that leave we Republicans in regards to both 2026 and
2028? First this fact...the
2028 election might well become a referendum on continuing or not
continuing with what has become known in some political circles as
the “Trump era.”
And second...with two+ years still to go before the next presidential
election we are already starting to see certain “of
name” politicians
in both parties...with fringe party individuals included as
well...trying to start lining up big money donor support; trying to
garner important name recognition while trying to project a semblance of
momentum before primary season even begins.
And know Democrat presidential hopefuls are doing all of the above as well.
But before I discuss some likely Republican 2028 presidential candidates, here are five facts that while not absolutes are still worth considering in what will surely be November's highly contested mid-term election, as well as 2028's presidential election.
Fact One: History has shown that when a successful now termed-out president of either party does leave office that their party still has a chance of holding onto power in the mid-term election that is unless...and this is key...the economy itself is then entering into or is in an actual downturn. And this is the time when many people seriously start asking themselves are prices at the pump now above or below what they were when the sitting president and his party took office...are the prices of groceries rising, falling or at best remaining stagnant...and is “affordability” still a “dirty word,” or is it a word to now be heralded?Remember, with a majority of folks making political decisions with their pocketbooks in mind, especially if the economy seems weak at or around election time, it is quite possible for the opposition party...here being the Democrat party...to not only gain momentum but actual political ground, maybe even a full House and Senate sweep in 2026, and then a presidential sweep in 2028 again based solely upon the state of the economy.
And in both elections herein lies the point where some might have to make the difficult choice between pocketbook and country, and for far too many Americans it's a choice not easily made.
Fact Two: at around the time of the midterms, many folks also start revisiting the “social issues,” to see how the candidates meld with or differ from their own personal and/or religious views, while at the sane tine comparing said issues to previous campaign promises made, promises kept, and promises thrown by the way side as well. Simply, is the candidate themself and their party ideology actually worthy of two or four more years in power courtesy of their vote, or is it now the time for what they might consider to be a much needed political leadership change.
And the word “change” itself leads directly into the 2028 presidential scenario for some semblance of “change” will already have come courtesy of 2026's mid-term election results, whether the results be for better or worse depending on one's party affiliation. But no matter the scenario other facts simply cannot be ignored.
Fact Three: the MAGA concept will still drive the discourse in 2028, but with an unexpected twist in that the one deemed by most to be Trump's presidential heir apparent...meaning Vice President JD Vance...might not be that heir after all. Why so...because (I believe) two better candidates have already been spoken about in Republican political circles, as in Florida's Governor Ron DeSantis, and our current “Secretary of State” Marco Rubio.
And why are they better candidates...because while Vance is a good, decent, and honorable man who proudly served in our nation's military, many believe, as do I, that he has not shown himself to be presidential material. Basically a newbie to the Republican party, JD Vance only switched parties and became a Republican when he first announced his candidacy for the U.S. Senate in July 2021, and only then became Trump's VP pick on the recommendation of Donald Jr., who saw strategic political advantages in using this young man...who once was an avowed “Never Trumper”...to help sway younger voters into voting Republican.
And while that ploy worked to a degree, Vance...a man too far to the religious far right who does not fully embrace our founding concept of “separation of Church and State”...has done nothing of political substance except being the president's “yes man” ...the resume of many former VPs...to warrant his being the leader of both the United States and the “free world.”
Simply, JD Vance, in my opinion, lacks political substance and actual leadership experience, something that can only be garnered with time and application. And besides, many times vice-presidents have turned into one-term presidents...“Read my lips,” George HW, Bush comes quickly to mind... making them basically “lame duck presidents,” which usually hurts their party in the next election cycle go-round.
Fact Four: Now, on the other hand, history shows that governors tend to make both the best presidential candidates and the best presidents. Why so...because as their state's elected head, a governor is able to show the voters how their executive experience, crisis management skills, and budgetary successes resulted in tangible all around achievements for their state's citizens. And two-term Governor Ron DeSantis' overall handling of the now and forever to be “Free State of Florida”...along with his recent spearheading the big win for Republicans regarding the redistricting issue....has seen him resonating well with voters nationwide.Fact Five: And while six “Secretaries of State”* became president up until the mid-19th century... no modern day president has been “Secretary of State” or “National Security Advisor” But that could change courtesy of current “Secretary of State” Marco Rubio who ranks right up there with Henry Kissinger as one of the hardest working, most diligent “Secretary of State's” ever.
And with Marco Rubio's 14-year experience as a U.S. Senator...as opposed to Vance's mere 18 months...and being both the Chair and the Vice Chair of the “Senate Intelligence Committee,” and also chairing the “Senate Small Business Committee,” Rubio is very well versed in government operations, and was the only one of Trump's cabinet picks to be unanimously approved by both Republicans and Democrats alike...bipartisanship in action...something our country desperately needs.
And when you compare both men's resumes to that of JD Vance, for the sake of our beloved America I hope President Trump lets “We the People “ decide who will head the 2028 presidential ticket even if if means having an open convention...even if it means JD Vance on his own sees the writing on the wall, and decides not to run.
Our
country deserves leaders who shine...let's give her that starting in
2026 by setting her on the right track for 2028. Case closed.
__________________________________________
Footnote
*
The six Secretaries of State who became U.S. President were: Thomas
Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Quincy Adams, Martin
Van Buren, and James Buchanan.
************************************************************************************************** For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, Operation Let Them Talk.
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Tuesday, May 5, 2026
...And herein now lies the problem, for unseen since the days of the great Ronald Reagan has “bipartisanship” been a true and lasting Congressional reality. Why so...because both Democrats and Republicans now seem to thrive on constantly being at each others political throats, thus they never allow themselves to even begin to work together to find common sense solutions to the shared problems at hand. And in their failing to do so, these folks willingly ignore the fact that the act of “bipartisanship” itself can actually help to negate the extreme wings...the overtly vocal and at times physically dangerous wings...of both the Republican and Democrat parties.
And also something to note is that “bipartisanship” does tend to lead to overall governmental stability via the implementation of not only centrist solutions to problems, but accomplishes this while eliminating the fear of policy reversals occurring simply because the party in power has once again shifted hands...the very thing that has allowed round after round of inane partisan bickering to sadly become the new norm.
In other words “bipartisanship” does work best when it's coupled with both parties returning to the letter of the law that is the “United States Constitution.” Read entire article here.
Monday, May 4, 2026
In the wake of the latest assassination attempt against President Donald Trump, it has become obvious of just how politically divided America is today, And said divide is much deeper than just your average Democrat vs. Republican ideological rhetoric, because it has now reached a point where some Republicans are as far to the right as some Democrats are to the left. In fact, at times, the political discourse of today has now become so heated that the radical right can now actually shake hands with the radical left, and visa-versa.
One case in point can be summed up by these thirteen words, “America will not be lectured about civility by far-right extremists in Congress"...now is a time to unify.”
These were the fighting words spoken by House Minority Speaker Hakeem Jeffries, and were aimed directly at Florida's Governor Ron DeSantis...words to the affect that Governor DeSantis best dare not try to redraw Florida's Congressional districts before this November's midterm election. But spew as he may, these were indeed foolish words for what Jeffries willingly chose to ignore is the fact that not only is Virginia's recent redistricting election itself being contested, but that said election might actually be unconstitutional in some aspects.
And to add even more fuel to the fires of political discontentment come these words.... words again spewed by Hakeem Jeffries just days before the recent “White House Correspondents Dinner” fiasco. And these words actually called for "maximum warfare" against Republicans in that Jeffries stated that, “We (Democrats) are in an era of maximum warfare. Everywhere, all the time.”
And foolish man that he is, Jeffries added that the Democrats would continue to “ratchet up pressure” on Republicans nationwide, but he never explained exactly what said “pressure” would or might be.
Simply, America is now in a war against itself...that's how far the political divide has caused us to stray from out founding principle know as, “We the People.” Three little words seemingly buried in partisan driven hate that sadly shows the world who we've now become as a nation. And for me that downfall started the very day a community organizer from Chicago not only sashayed across the stage to give Bill Clinton's presidential nominating address, but who set the stage for almost all the problems we politically and socially face today, and he...Barack Hussein Obama...did so simply by his willingly allowing “bipartisanship” to become a “dirty word” so to speak.
And herein now lies the problem, for unseen since the days of the great Ronald Reagan has “bipartisanship” been a true and lasting Congressional reality. Why so...because both Democrats and Republicans now seem to thrive on constantly being at each others political throats, thus they never allow themselves to even begin to work together to find common sense solutions to the shared problems at hand. And in their failing to do so, these folks willingly ignore the fact that the act of “bipartisanship” itself can actually help to negate the extreme wings...the overtly vocal and at times physically dangerous wings...of both the Republican and Democrat parties.
And also something to note is that “bipartisanship” does tend to lead to overall governmental stability via the implementation of not only centrist solutions to problems, but accomplishes this while eliminating the fear of policy reversals occurring simply because the party in power has once again shifted hands...the very thing that has allowed round after round of inane partisan bickering to sadly become the new norm.
In other words “bipartisanship” does work best when it's coupled with both parties returning to the letter of the law that is the “United States Constitution.”
In fact, Reagan willingly and constructively worked together with what was then a Democratic controlled Congress to pass both his version of comprehensive immigration and tax reforms, along with what he deemed to be a “supply-side” economic program... a program which included massive tax cuts to help stimulate what was then a stagnant economy...thanks to his predecessor Jimmy Carter...thus he was able to increase revenues from taxes while income levels grew.
Copyright © 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor /All rights reserved.
************************************************************************************************** For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, Gaslighting vs. The Receipts.
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Saturday, December 6, 2025
Tuesday, December 2, 2025
...And that's not all, for while Qatar and Putin's Russia are not “formally recognized” as allies, they do nurture a growing strategic partnership along with shared political and economic ties...ties based upon a diverse range of issues including, but not limited to, energy, trade, and the allowing of both countries to have a hand in profiting from Middle East regional conflicts.
Qatar...no matter it technically being a U.S. ally...no matter us having the “AL-Udeid Air Base” (the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East) in Qatar for over two decades...Qatar still cannot and should not be trusted as a main player in the still ongoing Israel/Hamas peace process let alone in the Middle East region itself. And why...because with Qatar having adopted what's called an “activist foreign policy,'' it allows them to actually play both sides against the middle as they continue to help fund certain terrorist aligned nations, even if its under the radar so to speak, while at the same time playing the part of being a peace negotiator. And not to be forgotten is that the UAE and all important Saudi Arabia both share a deep disdain for Qatar. Why so... because Qatar is the main financier of the Muslim Brotherhood...Read entire article here.
Monday, December 1, 2025
In 'Part One' of this series I began by stating that I voted for Donald J. Trump three times, and would vote for him a fourth time if it was constitutionally allowed. And know I still stand by those words even though I disagreed with his putting the “tariffs” before the economy itself. Here you can read why in 'Part One.'
In this 'Part Two' I will delve into why I believe President Trump made a second mistake regarding the logistics of the Israel/Hamas ceasefire being a pathway to peace, as well as briefly touching upon a possible third mistake being made...one that might or might not happen...in regards to the 2028 Republican presidential ticket.
So let me begin by saying that while our president's intentions were both honorable and just, his mistake regarding the ceasefire was made by his breaking one of America's cardinal rules, as in America does not...I repeat does not...negotiate with terrorists. And while this has technically been a long-standing but unwritten core principle of U.S. foreign policy, the reality is that said rule has sadly been broken before, often with disastrous and/or questionable results.
One such example took place in 2014, when then President Obama made the highly questionable “5-for-1” prisoner exchange with the Taliban. Briefly, Obama's deal, made courtesy of a third party nation, saw five top level Taliban commanders being exchanged for American traitor Bowe Bergdahl... who upon being returned home faced charges of “desertion and misbehavior before the enemy.”
And while prosecutors at his court-martial did seek a sentence of 14 years in prison, Bergadahl was given no time after having submitted so-called “evidence of torture” while being held by the Taliban. However, Bergdahl was dishonorably discharged (rightfully making him ineligible for health services and disability benefits), and ordered to forfeit $10,000 in pay. All but a slap on the wrist, in my opinion, because he knowingly and willingly put his fellow American soldiers lives in danger when he deserted and went looking for the enemy, but Obama obviously saw the situation differently, and we all can surmise why.
Now as for the five Taliban commanders, their punishment was indeed but a mere slap on the wrist for after being subjected to a one-year travel ban and monitoring in the nation Obama turned them over to, these five terrorists were back out on the field orchestrating and succeeding in the killing of more American military personnel.
Now here is where it gets interesting for the nation that helped in Obama's brokering of the infamous “5-for-1” prisoner exchange is the very same nation that helped to broker President Trump's what is now turning out to be anything but a “ceasefire deal.” And that nation is Qatar...the very nation Obama transferred the custody of the Taliban commanders to back in 2014, and we all know how well that turned out to be, now don't we... sarcastically said of course.
And know this is the same Qatar who willingly gave “safe harbor,” and still does, to top Hamas officials before, during, and now after the Trump initiated Israel/Hamas ceasefire went into effect...a ceasefire whose conditions Hamas has broken time and time again. And Qatar also played a central role as the primary mediator in the negotiations for the said “ceasefire.” Now rightfully facing criticism and pressure from Israel and as well as from some here in the U.S. regarding its continuing ties to Hamas, one must remember that Qatar also supported Hamas' governance in Gaza, and remains dedicated to Hamas' goal of there being a “two-state solution” to said war.
Simply, Qatar...just like all muslim dominated islamic nations... will do and say anything, including making promises and faux gestures of wanting peace if it helps to push forward “radical islam's” ultimate objective of total world submission to islam...a world that obviously would be minus Christians and Jews. And with Trump's bringing Qatar into the ceasefire fold, he has now also allowed...albeit unknowingly...Qatar to succeed in their quest of becoming a “player” on the world stage, with their added bonus being a hoped for drawing of a wedge between Israel and the U.S.
And why is this disturbing... because Qatar still maintains open communication with not only terrorist groups like the Taliban and Hamas, but has diplomatic and economic relations with Iran as well. No wonder Israel is not happy with Qatar having been any part of the ceasefire deal, especially since Qatar had established unofficial trade relations with Israel in 1996, but “permanently” severed those relations in 2009, and to date has still not normalized nor even attempted to normalize relations with Israel.
And that's not all, for while Qatar and Putin's Russia are not “formally recognized” as allies, they do nurture a growing strategic partnership along with shared political and economic ties...ties based upon a diverse range of issues including, but not limited to, energy, trade, and the allowing of both countries to have a hand in profiting from Middle East regional conflicts.
Qatar...no matter it technically being a U.S. ally...no matter us having the “AL-Udeid Air Base” (the largest U.S. military base in the Middle East) in Qatar for over two decades...Qatar still cannot and should not be trusted as a main player in the still ongoing Israel/Hamas peace process let alone in the Middle East region itself. And why...because with Qatar having adopted what's called an “activist foreign policy,'' it allows them to actually play both sides against the middle as they continue to help fund certain terrorist aligned nations, even if its under the radar so to speak, while at the same time playing the part of being a peace negotiator. And not to be forgotten is that the UAE and all important Saudi Arabia both share a deep disdain for Qatar. Why so... because Qatar is the main financier of the Muslim Brotherhood, which they rightfully deem to be a direct threat to both their monarchies and to Middle East peace.
Simply, in their playing both sides...impartiality be damned...Qatar remains in the media spotlight which alone helps in their quest to gain more and more influence in the region itself. But in reality Qatar's role is really that of being the “devil's advocate”...one just has to look at the aforementioned “5-for1” Taliban prisoner exchange coupled with its outcome to see that as being truth.
President Trump has to see this, Secretary of State Marco Rubio has to see this as well (and if anyone does it's him), but for some reason Donald Trump either does not see it or, like Qatar he is also playing, to some degree, both sides against the middle, but with the hope that it brings some semblance of peace to the Middle East.
I truly do believe that President Trump is dedicated to making peace happen, but the fact remains that dedication alone is not necessarily a harbinger of peace. And I hope that he is not totally counting on Qatar's promised trillion dollar investment in the U.S., especially since Qatar still has not ended its ties and support for a number of terrorist groups nor has it...and this bears repeating again...made any concerted effort to normalize relations with Israel...the very country they are playing...or supposedly playing...mediator for. Simply, I have a very uneasy feeling about this what well could be a mistake on President Trump's part, but only time will tell whether it is or not.
A possible mistake indeed. A mistake that if it is made, could well have serious ramifications in regards to the 2028 Republican presidential ticket.
And why is this so...because by the time the once vice president has served his own first term in office as president, the country itself would likely be ready for some vestiges of political change. And this could well be the case if the then new one term president was deemed to be but a continuation of his former boss's presidency, especially if the public deemed the former president's failures to have outnumbered his successes, and that the new president was carrying over the same failed policies into his presidency.
Now here please understand that while I believe JD Vance...Trump's seemingly designated heir apparent...has done well as vice president, he is not as well versed in foreign affairs as is Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and foreign affairs in today's volatile world is indeed as important as domestic issues. In fact, in some cases, foreign affairs directly affect our domestic issues more so than it affects the world at large.
“If they ever formed a group, it would be unstoppable. I really do. I believe that.” - So said President Trump just a few weeks ago when the idea of a Vance/Rubio 2028 ticket was being floated around.
And while I like those two names linked together, I do think Trump could be making a mistake in not making the ticket “Rubio/Vance.” Why so...because “Rubio/Vance” is a politically stronger ticket due to Rubio's 15 years in the U.S. Senate; his current position as Secretary of State; as well as his being a leading figure on foreign policy including the fact that he was a senior member of the Foreign Relations Committee; and served as Vice-Chair of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence.
J.D. Vance, had only served two years in the Senate before becoming vice president, but he does have one important credential I think all president's should have, as in hands-on military service...whether they be a veteran or former member of the National Guard. JD Vance is a U.S. Marine Corps veteran, and I truly honor him for that.
However, JD lacks something important that Rubio has, as in the ability to bring Independents and even moderate Democrats over to his side. Remember, Rubio was the only Trump nominee who sailed through the process with both Democrat and Republican support which bodes well with Independent voters. And it's these very voters who do not view Vance well, but see him as an opportunist after his having switched from being a Trump hater to a Trump loyalist.
But if the 2028 ticket is Vance/Rubio that is the ticket that gets my vote. However, my dream ticket would be DeSantis/Rubio...the best governor in the country paired with the best Secretary of State ever. Talk about a politically strong ticket...Trump would make no mistake with a ticket like that. Case closed.
Copyright © 2025 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All rights reserved.
**************************************************************************************************
For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article Release the Conspiracy Kraken.
**************************************************************************************************



























