Issue One: “The latest anti-Iran sedition was different in that the US president personally became involved.” So said Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, adding that “actors” linked to the United States and Israel were responsible for killing “several thousand” Iranians during the past few weeks of anti-government protests.
Tuesday, January 27, 2026
Monday, January 26, 2026
Issue One: “The latest anti-Iran sedition was different in that the US president personally became involved.” So said Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, adding that “actors” linked to the United States and Israel were responsible for killing “several thousand” Iranians during the past few weeks of anti-government protests.
Personally, I've always believed that Iran's people must rise up from within... like our forefathers did in regards to British crown rule some 250 years ago. And while we have witnessed an Iranian “populist” uprising, the problem is that not enough people joined in to successfully remove the current oppressive and murderous regime.
Remember, history has shown that freedom tends to belong to the strong...to those who put their lives on the line, and to those who die in the name of freedom...while the masses sit back and wait to garner the fruits of what is usually the freedom fighters bloody labor.
So what exactly must happen? Simply, the Revolutionary Guard (the IRGC) must turn their backs on Khamenei...like the Russian Bolshevik's did in 1917 against the Czar...for I believe there is no other way that the Iranian people acting solely on their own can secure a lasting win without some semblance of Iran's military...hence its military power...being on their side. I do believe President Trump likely knows this as well, but has yet to say it publicly.
Why so...because Trump knows that a revolution's success works best when it not only comes from within, but when the “game plan” is not publicly divulged until said plan is well underway...if even then.
So what exactly is the “game plan” for Iran and what can Trump do about it? It's uncertain, and probably unlikely, that the sum of the IRGC turns on Khamenei, but some Middle East so-called “experts” believe that a “succession crisis” is inevitable due to Khamanei's age and health issues which does seem to be a possibility, However, said possibility comes replete with problems of its own, as certain top tier Iranian military leaders could themselves take over and continue Khamenei's hard line regime, or so could those we would not normally expect, like the Kurds, which could see Iran's future being tenuous at best.
But one thing I do know is that if the Iranian people do secure their freedom, whether with Trump's help or on their own, the end of Iran's terrorist driven, theocratic dictatorship will see the entirety of the Middle East start falling into place for like in dominoes when one tile falls others soon follow. But what I hope is that our likely intervention does not come too late, for if it does not only will the Iranian people suffer tenfold, but Iran will become President Trump's Tiananmen Square.
Issue Two: Last week while in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum, President Trump presented his “Board of Peace” charter that is bringing “peace in the Middle East.” Saying that the Gaza war is now “down to little fires,” this plan is basically his 20-point plan for Gaza on steroids as the charter does not appear to limit its role to the Middle East alone.
Now seeing 50+* world leaders having received invites to join the “Board of Peace” ...including Vladimir Putin...with over 35 already having signed on, we find our NATO allies France, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Slovenia, and Canada declining, with Trump rescinding Canada's invite. And while some signers do question the board's “three-tier governing structure,” where Trump and pro-Israel officials sit at the top, others question why the Palestinians have little say in deciding Gaza's future governance. I say that's a good decision on Trump's part for not one Palestinian leader has yet condemned nor apologize for Hamas' actions of October 7th. Remember the old adage, “If you don't condemn you condone,” those words fit these folks to a tee.
So what exactly will the “Board of Peace” do? Right now said board will be a transitional administration for Gaza's redevelopment until 2027, and is tasked with overseeing reconstruction, humanitarian aid, and being an international stabilizing force for the region, while at the same time striving for broader global conflict resolution...sort of doing the job the U.N. refuses to do. And this has me believing that if the “Board of Peace” is successful that its ultimate goal is to either work side-by-side with the U.N. or possibly even replace the very organization that has truly become derelict in its duties.
Now as for the key to the board's success, we see the“Founding Executive Board of Peace” being rightfully chaired by President Trump, who alone retains full veto and purse string power, as well as having the sole authority to remove members, set the agenda, and override decisions.
The other Executive Board members who hold voting rights are U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio...one of the most pro-Israel officials in Trump's administration as is fellow board member U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff. Then there's staunch Israel supporter Jared Kushner, Trump’s son-in-law, and one of the driving forces behind the “Abraham Accords,” as well as pro-Israel businessman Marc Rowan, co-founder of Apollo Global Management, one of the world’s largest investment firms; Ajay Banga currently the World Bank's president; former British Prime Minister Tony Blair, a staunch supporter of both Israel and the “War on Terror;” and Robert Gabriel Jr., a deputy national security adviser in Trump's administration.
This no nonsense executive board is surely needed what with Turkey, Jordan, and Qatar, having signed onto the “Board of Peace.” And thus this question,”Why did Israel-hating Turkey, Jordan's Muslim Brotherhood supporting “kinglet,” and Hamas' sanctuary Qatar even receive invites to join the board? And the only answer that makes any sense has to do with money as those wealthy nations wanting permanent board seats must pay $1 billion for said seat, with those monies being used for Gaza's reconstruction. And with none of the three having yet to become permanent members, one has to wonder why they signed on, for I do not believe peace is their objective...trying to derail the plan's goal seems more likely to me. Best the board keep an eye on these three is all I have to say.So what was Israel's response to the plan after having originally criticized the inclusion of Turkey and Qatar? Israel, as expected, did agree to join the “Board of Peace” no matter that Netanyahu and other top Israeli officials felt that parts of said plan were contrary to Israeli policy, but it was made clear that at no time was not participating ever an option. Why so...because for Israel, who truly wants lasting peace, to do otherwise would find certain foxes guarding its hen house so to speak.
And while I hoped that neither Turkey nor Qatar would be allowed to hold any positions on the “Peace Board,” I still hope that Trump does not allow either nation's troops to be on the ground for neither can be trusted to follow through on Gaza's disarmament plan. Why so... because both nations gave “safe harbor” to Hamas officials before and after October 7th and still do, thus proving with whom their true loyalties lie.
But the bottom line for me is this...if Trump's “Peace Plan” is not successful a failure would see us bearing witness to not just a continuation of regional instability and conflict, but a renewal of fighting where Israel rightfully holds nothing back. This land belongs to Israel and the Jewish people, and it's time the world understands that as fact, after all the Palestinians...who are at the crux of this matter...do have and have always had a homeland, it's called Jordan, and that's where they belong, “Peace Plan” or not.
Issue Three: This issue can be sunned up in one word: Greenland, the island nation President Trump has long been trying to acquire and for all the right reasons yet, in my opinion, he was using all the wrong tactics to accomplish that goal. But that has now been remedied as his latest tactic regarding tariffs being imposed on any European country...including Greenland's owner Denmark...who voiced opposition to his doing so has now been removed from the discourse. And why so...because last Wednesday at Davos it was announced that a “framework deal” had been reached that would make all parties involved happy.
But first, why really did Trump want Greenland besides what has always been its strategic military location regarding the controlling of the Arctic and North Atlantic against any threats by either Russia and/or China? Simply, because Greenland has a huge amount of untapped “rare-earth mineral resources” which if we owned Greenland would be a huge economic win not unlike the Venezuelan oil industry now basically being under U.S. control.
But Trump never really wanted Greenland to become another Venezuela for Denmark is a NATO nation, and resorting to military action against a fellow NATO member would not have served Trump well. But history shows that threats only work when backed up by military action...one just has to look at both last summer's military action against Iran's nuclear plants, and Trump's recent ouster of Venezuela's dictator Nicholas Maduro, and try to imagine said action being used in regards to Greenland. Common sense alone shows it would not sit well in the political court of public opinion, plus the fact that a “January 16 - 19, 2026 Economist / YouGov Poll” showed that a only 9% of Americans across all party lines approved of Trump using military force to take control of Greenland.
And why is this important...because when even Republicans are vehemently opposed to such action, and if said action were to be taken it could see Republicans losing the House. And Trump obviously knowing this thankfully saw him changing his what were bully tactics, and with said change came a “framework for a future deal,” a deal reached after his having met with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.
So what exactly does this “framework for a future deal,” or as Trump now calls it “the ultimate long-term deal,” include? These are the top three framework issues that would give the U.S. “everything we want,” as per President Trump.
First: In return for Trump's canceling his threatened tariffs on Europe and ruling out taking Greenland by force or by “excessive strength,” and with Denmark insisting that its “red line” sovereignty over the island was not up for discussion, there will be ongoing discussions regarding the “Golden Dome” (the $175 billion multilayered missile defense system that would include space-based components and utilize Greenland's strategic location).
Second: We would see an increase in U.S. Arctic presence to ensure that both Russia and China do not gain economic or military footholds in the region (something both Denmark and Greenland agree with); along with joint defense renegotiations between us and Denmark relating to the 1951 defense pact and our expanding U.S. presence at the strategic Pituffik Space Base.
Third: The U.S. would be given unfettered mineral resource mining rights as well as access into perpetuity to Greenland's rare-earth minerals...minerals which are much needed in the manufacturing of today's modern technology. An announcement not totally unexpected, but one that is surely welcomed, and should be beneficial to all the parties involved.
And so with this latest announcement at Davos, and with neither of the other two issues presented having been fully resolved yet either, all are at least on their way to resolution. But as with most issues of importance only time will tell how each will play out. The clock is ticking...cases closed.
_____________________________________________________________
Footnote
* As I was writing this article this was the 'latest list of countries' who had signed on to President Trump's “Board of Peace” plan.**************************************************************************************************
**************************************************************************************************
Saturday, September 20, 2025
Right Side Patriots...Podcast Here's the podcast of last nights 'LIVE' radio broadcast where Craig & Diane discussed President Trump's UK visit; Antifa is now officially designated as a terrorist group; the Trump/Xi TikTok framework agreement; and our 'Off the Cuff" segment. Listen to it on https://rspradio1.podbean.com
Friday, September 19, 2025
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE! Today, Friday, September 19th from 7 to 8:00pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen & Diane Sori discuss President Trump's UK visit; Antifa is now officially designated as a terrorist group; the Trump/Xi TikTok framework agreement; and our 'Off the Cuff" segment. On https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE.'
Monday, September 2, 2019
Takeaways and Ramifications of the Recent G7 Summit
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
He came...he saw...he conquered...at the G7 Summit in Barrittz, France that is. And by “he” I mean President Donald J. Trump, for the “master of the deal” surely made America the "winner" once again.
The G7 summit...a gathering composed of the most advanced economies in the world as in the United States, France, Canada, Germany, Japan, Italy, and the United Kingdom...got off to a bit of a rocky start with President Trump “strongly requesting,” at last Saturday's formal dinner, that its members allow Russia back into the economic fold after being removed back in 2014 for its “illegally” annexing Crimea. And the G7 members response...“Most of the other leaders insisted on this being a family, a club, a community of liberal democracies and for that reason they said you cannot allow president Putin—who does not represent that—back in,” so said the summit's ever foolish host French President Emmanuel Macron to President Trump.
But his words did not speak for Italian Prime Minister Giuseppe Conte who was the only G7 member to support President Trump’s rightful position. And this man, who, as I write this, attended in what's called a “caretaker roll” as he soon will be stepping down from his position, also agreed with our president that Vladimir Putin should be in on the group’s discussions about Iran, Syria, and North Korea. Smart man Conte is...too bad Italian politics have basically forced his resignation.
But why is President Trump right in his stance on Russia returning to the G7, making it the G8 once again...simply because in today's heated political world...a tinderbox world rife with those ready to kill us all...common sense alone should dictate that it's better for Russia, the world's number two super power, to be if not an actual friend at least be a de-facto partner of sorts.
So while Trump didn't win on Russia he did, as per the White House, end on a high note in five key areas, with those areas being sending a message of economic unity; the U.S. securing of a framework billion-dollar trade deal with Japan; promoting the "United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement" (USMCA); developing stronger trade with Europe; and helping to reduce India-Pakistan tensions. And let's not forget the one “win” Democrats feared most...the “win” that will not only soar economically above all the others, but it's a “win” that will assure President Trump a well deserved second term in office. And what exactly is that “win”...it's that China is now on the verge of economically bowing to President Trump, if you will, as the tariffs he imposed on them are taking their rightful toll.
But before I get into more details involving China, lets step back a bit and focus first on President Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe announcing that our two countries had agreed to the “framework” of a trade deal. This trade deal involves Japan buying excess corn from U.S. farmers; Japan lowering tariffs on imported U.S. beef and pork exports to the same levels as those proposed for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which is around 9% down from the current 38.5%; all while keeping in place, for now anyway, the U.S. import tax of 2.5% and 25% respectively on the $50 billion worth of Japanese automobiles, trucks, and parts Japan exports to our country annually.
So why is Japan agreeing to this...simply because Japan is trying
hard to stay in Trump’s good graces, if you will, in order to avoid even
costlier tariffs while retaining their “positive relationship” with its key
ally the U.S...an ally Japan knows well ensures its security against
both China and North Korea. And Japan is also hoping to secure U.S. support in their ever ongoing “diplomatic spat” with South Korea...an escalating so nasty “spat”
over Japan’s "conduct" towards Korea during World War II that has now
turned into a full-blown feud over trade and national security.And both President Trump and Prime Minister Shinzo Abe hope to get this what is now “framework” deal finalized and signed by September, when again they meet, this time in New York City for the next United Nations General Assembly. And once signed, this deal with Japan would give President Trump an actual tangible victory in the current trade war with China...a trade war that saw China announcing new tariffs on $75 billion of U.S. goods in retaliation for Trump's existing 25% tariffs on some $250+ billion in imports from China being raised to 30% come October 1st.
But like I stated earlier, China...the very country Trump has long accused of currency manipulation and carrying out flagrant intellectual property theft...that country seems to be wavering a bit...as in being on the verge of actually starting to comply for as per White House Chef Economic Advisor Larry Kudlow, “The largest part of the economic burden of the tariffs has fallen on China.” No truer words spoken as China's currency, the yuan, has sunk to an 11-year low...a low not seen since the 2008 world financial crisis..and this is no matter that the Chinese government itself, not the free market, sets its currency's value against the dollar. Also, China has lost some five million jobs and two million manufacturing jobs since the newest round of tariffs took hold while our economy remains strong as it's 50% larger than China's and relies much less on imports and exports...key elements to consider when determining who will actually “win” any given trade war.
So why exactly are the U.S. and China closer to resolving their trade dispute especially when their differences are rooted in deeply entrenched domestic politics within both countries? Why...because of President Trump's “long term” economic approach to China instead of his ignoring China's “fingers crossed behind their back” G20 commitment to fair trade...an anything but commitment that saw China “dumping” their goods below cost into our U.S. markets something past presidents, especially Obama, have ignored. And this dirty tactic is now backfiring on China thanks to President Trump's regulations overhaul which sees major American manufacturing companies returning home to the U.S., thus creating jobs here instead of over there. And this in turn is greatly hurting China's economy while boosting our own.
America and Americans first...as it should be...as it always must be.
So while China has lodged a formal diplomatic complaint what with Trump's latest tariff increases looming, both sides continue working behind the scenes to “rebalance economic relations” and move towards a trade war truce that is not only enforceable but a deal that would allow China to “save face.” Remember, as the world's third largest superpower, China cannot afford to appear weak in the eyes of the world even if President Trump appears strong...which he does. And let's not forget that China's “dumping” tactics aren't sitting too well with the Europeans either...meaning it's to China's advantage to “play nice” with the U.S. or else risk economic collapse.
Another G7 “win” for President Trump and hence the U.S., came during his side-line meeting with India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi. During this meeting President Trump publicly acknowledged India's role as a critical partner in the ongoing war in Afghanistan, reaffirmed the need for “dialogue” between India and Pakistan, and saw both he and Modi speaking of resuming bilateral trade negotiations...trade negotiations that got somewhat derailed after Washington removed the Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) for Indian exporters.
This action saw India imposing retaliatory duties on 28 American products in response to the unilateral increase in import duties on India’s aluminum and steel, but that now seems like water under the bridge because after the meeting Prime Minister Modi tweeted this, “Excellent meeting with Donald Trump. We had useful discussions on bilateral matters. We agreed to address trade issues for mutual benefit soon. Looking forward to expanding cooperation as large democracies for the benefit of our citizens and global peace and prosperity.” Says a lot now doesn't it. And not to be overlooked is India's new trade deals and ties with the Jewish State of Israel, which also helps to solidify our ties to India and India's ties to the U.S.
Yet another “win” came when President Trump, with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau by his side, talked about the importance of expanding America's trading partnership with its neighbors by passing the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). And with both Canada and Mexico having essentially finalized the deal...the replacement to NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement), Trump strongly noted that it was time for U.S. lawmakers to do the same...after all it's a deal where America and Americans see the most economic benefits.
But I can't speak or write this article about the G7 Summit without mentioning the more than rightful concern of our president when host Emmanuel Macron, on behalf of the French government, had the unmitigated gall to invite to the summit and who then showed up, but Iran's Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif. Saying to reporters that his invitation intent was to “deescalate nuclear tensions in the Middle East,” saw President Trump responding to the reporters that, “we’ll do our own outreach.” And pray tell how does Macron's inviting the prime minister of the world's leading sponsor of terrorism have anything to do with economics especially in light of his previous words in regards to Russia that this meeting is a meeting of “...a family, a club, a community of liberal democracies...” Simply, it does not as neither Iran nor its prime minister fit into any of those categories.
So why did Macron really invite Zarif to the summit? The answer is simple...while President Trump did know ahead of time about the invitation and let Macron know in no uncertain terms that he would not meet with Zarif, the fact is Macron did what he did, contrary to media reports, to annoy and try to discredit President Trump as well as to slap our country in the face. Trying to “trump Trump” as the big boy at the summit, Macron failed miserably as he showed himself as both catering to Iran and using Zarif for his own political purposes what with his poll numbers tanking by the day.
The islamist condoner using an islamist...hope the French people wake up and see reality...France remaining French depends on it.
So there you have my take on this years G7 Summit. Next year the summit will likely be here in the U.S... probably at The Trump National Doral grounds in Miami, Florida...and I'm sure Russia's Vladimir Putin will be in attendance...as he most assuredly should have been this time around.
Copyright @ 2019 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.
**************************************************************************************************************************************
For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, The 2nd Amendment - History vs The Myths.
Due to Hurricane Dorian...and with Diane living within the infamous "cone"...Right Side Patriots will NOT be on tomorrow night but will return live on Friday, September 6th at its regularly scheduled time and place. Look for us at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history...or on Tune-In at: https://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/
Monday, June 29, 2015
Three Issues Soon to be Decided...Part 3 of 3
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on CPR Worldwide Media cprworldwidemedia.net
"The intent of everybody here -- the P5+1, the European Union, Iran
-- is to stay until we get this done, or find out we can't. And our
intent is to get it done." - Words of an unnamed U.S. official in regards to reaching a deal with Iran by the now extended June 30th deadline.
In part 1 of this 3 part series, I discussed what was still at that time the upcoming SCOTUS decision on same-sex marriage (and the High Court has now upheld same-sex marriage in all 50 states); in part 2, I discussed how we were blindsided by the SCOTUS decision coming down in support of the anything but Affordable Care Act...aka ObamaCare; and now in the part 3, I will discuss the officially extended June 30th deadline for what is being called 'a few more days'...or if we walk away from the table...as we rightfully should...but most likely will NOT.
Still to be worked out...that is if we believe the scuttle-but being released by the media...is an exact timetable for sanctions relief; the actual disarmament steps by which Iran must rid itself of its current uranium stockpile; a binding promise to halt any and all future nuclear weapons research along with a halt to the development of newer and faster centrifuges; and also how possible violations by either side will be handled, including how UN sanctions might be reinstated if need be.
And know that sanctions relief is first and foremost Iran's main goal because said sanctions have choked Iran's economy and limited their access to world oil markets, but know that these sanctions are the one thing we can hold as leverage over Iran's head...that is if we were negotiating a 'real' deal and NOT a sellout to the enemy. A sellout that even has some of Obama's former military and foreign policy advisers outwardly voicing major disapproval over certain terms that seem to have already been 'secretly' reached ahead of the now extended deadline.
"The agreement will not prevent Iran from having a nuclear weapons capability," said a letter signed by former CIA Director David Petraeus, former White House Iran advisor Dennis Ross, former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. James Cartwright, and others, who called for Obama...but were as to be expected met with 'so-called' deaf ears...to NOT only take an even harder stance on lifting sanctions, but to include in the actual wording of any deal reached that NO sanctions will be lifted until Iran completely complies with all terms of said deal. In fact, the letter also states that new sanctions should be prepared and ready to go ahead of time just in case Iran does NOT abide by the agreement...and we know that this would be the most likely scenario.
Now add into this very 'hot' mix that mere days before what was to be
the June 30th deadline, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei ...the ultimate arbiter of all matters concerning Iran's nuclear program...has
reiterated what Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif''s deputy Abbas
Araqchi recently said to the press about some of the 'solutions' found in
the April 2nd Lausanne framework deal NO longer working because after
Lausanne certain countries within the P5+1 have now made declarations of change
in their position which he claims “complicates the task” at hand.
And to that affect Khamenei has now made a series of demands...'red
lines' of his own...as to what will be the final terms he will have Iran
agree to...with those terms being an 'immediate' end to all UN and U.S.
economic sanctions thus allowing Iran to gain relief from billions of
dollars in economic penalties; that Iranian military sites including
‘security and defensive’ sectors will NOT allow even 'managed access' to
international inspections; that there will be NO long-term halt on
nuclear research; and that NO IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency)
interviews with any persons having any connections to Iran’s nuclear program
will be allowed...demands that are a direct 180 turn from the P5+1
'supposedly' non-negotiable demands that NO lifting of the sanctions
will be done until after the IAEA confirms that Iran is abiding by the
deal; that a lasting limitation of Iran’s nuclear capacities in research
and production is agreed to; that a 'rigorous,' on-going, and unhindered inspection
of military sites must be allowed; and that a mechanism to quickly
reimpose sanctions is in place before they would sign on the dotted line.So, in other words, whatever the P5+1 wants Iran has said NO to but as it stands now Obama... through his mouthpiece John 'Swiftboat' Kerry...will most likely say YES to.
And why...because Barack HUSSEIN Obama wants a deal signed at any cost, after all it's all about his immediate legacy and current agenda as we head into the 2016 election, but know that if this deal goes through with Iran having the upper hand that Obama's ultimate legacy will show that he led America to make a deal with the devil. And know that any agreement Obama makes with this rogue and oh so dangerous nation gives them legitimacy in the eyes of the world as it allows for a military dimension to be added into the Iranian claimed 'peaceful nuclear' mix, thus putting regional power into the hands of the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism (in fact a recently published U.S. State Department report on terror activity noted that Iran's “state sponsorship of terrorism worldwide remained undiminished”) and of human rights violations; it directly puts our ally Israel in the cross hairs; it strengthens the mullahs already all-consuming grip on power; and most importantly it affords Iran the chance to become a full-fledged, in-our-face, nuclear power...again if they are NOT already one. This is what Iran wants and make NO mistake this is also what Obama wants for he, like the Iranian regime, is an islamist at heart.
An islamist at heart proven time and again by Obama's concession after
concession in his goal to reach an agreement NO matter how bad that
agreement is for our country or for our allies. Starting with the
sanctions...sanctions that should only be lifted after Iran has proven
over time to be upholding their part of the deal...now has Obama
acquiescing to lifting any sanctions NOT directly related to Iran’s
nuclear program; continues with his doing away with the the requirement
that Iran disclose all previous nuclear activity which means that IAEA
inspectors cannot establish a true 'baseline' for future inspections;
and ends with his suddenly but NOT unexpectedly vacillating on the P5+1
demand that inspections of military sites be done by the IAEA coupled
with their having unlimited access to Iran's scientists. And these are
all critical to both monitoring the agreement and to checking whether
Iran is cheating by secretly pursuing an 'under the radar' nuclear
weapons program...and again are all things Obama appears to be giving in on.And so it becomes increasingly apparent that the words of Lieutenant General Michael Flynn, a former senior military intelligence advisor to Obama ring very true when he states that the deal being worked on “suffers from severe deficiencies as Iran has every intention to build a nuclear weapon.”
YES they do...Obama knows this but simply does NOT care. And to make this so-wanted farce of a deal even more grievous is the fact that now Obama wants to give Iran high-tech, light-water nuclear reactors...even as they continue marching through the streets of Tehran shouting “Death to America” and "Death to Israel." As per details in a leaked thus NO longer confidential document that is part of the appendices titled 'Civil Nuclear Cooperation,' Obama promises said reactors if Iran ceases operations at its almost completed heavy-water facility at Arak...and he's claiming that reducing...NOT eliminating...Arak's plutonium output was always one of the primary goals of the U.S. and its negotiating partners. But pray tell how does giving the enemy the very thing they need stop them from attaining their goal as it is quite easy to reconfigure light-water reactors into the nuclear needed heavy-water reactors...but Obama knows this and just does NOT care...of that I'm sure.
And so with the deadline for this farce of a deal being extended for 'a
few more days' it becomes apparent that while Khamenei is holding fast
to his demands that nuclear-research restrictions, delayed sanctions
relief, and open inspections would be a deal killer, John 'Swiftboat'
Kerry tap dances...on crutches...around the fact that with Obama's
leaked promise to give nuclear reactors to America's enemy NO matter
that the talks are but a 'dog and pony' show...NO matter if a 'real'
deal is even reached...a spokesman for the Iranian delegation
confirmed...a spokesman with his fingers crossed behind his back as in
can you say taqiyya...that “because there is still lots of work to do the
delegations will remain beyond...(July 1) to continue the negotiations
and reach a good overall deal.”And to that I say a good deal for Iran but a bad deal...a very bad deal...for the rest of the world. But what can you expect when a traitor occupies the White House, a traitor is America's head negotiator, and we have a lily-livered 'supposedly' Republican controlled Congress who while they still must approve any deal will assuredly cave into White House pressure as they are headed by the likes of RINOS John Boehner and Mitch McConnell...and to that sadly all I can do is sigh...
Wednesday, April 22, 2015
A Laughable Message To Iran That We Are Watching
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on cprworldwidemedia.net
"We don't let anyone give us warnings and threats, because we are working according to international law and regulations...we work for the security of our country and other countries." - Flotilla Admiral Habibollah Sayyar, Commander of Iran's Regular Navy
And so the game of 'leverage' begins...
Coming soon after last weeks U.N. Security Council resolution that imposed an arms embargo on leaders of the Iranian-backed Shi'ite Yemini Houthi rebel fighters...and just weeks after Obama and the P5+1 sold the U.S. and Israel out in that joke of a 'framework deal' with Iran over its nuclear ambitions...last Sunday the Navy aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt and her escort ship the guided-missile cruiser USS Normandy left the Persian Gulf and headed for the Arabian Sea...to the waters off Yemen...in what Naval officials have called "maritime security operations" to ensure that vital shipping lanes remain open and safe.
And if you believe that I've got some swamp land to sell you.
So with the Roosevelt joining nine other American warships... including cruisers and destroyers carrying 'board and search' teams...teams that 'anonymous' Naval sources say will intercept any Iranian vessels carrying weapons to the Houthi rebels...and at last report there was an Iranian convoy of eight ships nearing Yemeni waters...this is anything but a so-called routine 'operation' NO matter that our Navy has in the past conducted consensual boarding of ships.
Remember, the fact is that we do NOT have the legal authority or any authority to board Iranian-flagged ships even with the U.N. resolution in place...and yet this is was what 'anonymous' Naval sources say we will be doing...an action that could be construed as a declaration of war against Iran...an action counter to Pentagon spokesman Col. Steve Warren saying, “Ships are repositioning to conduct maritime security operations, they are not going to intercept Iranian ships.”
But wasn't Yemen supposed to be at peace as in an Obama success story...that's what we were told...but once again it turns out it's just another in a long list of lies spewed by this administration.
Yemen is now a country in turmoil...a country in the grips of yet
another Arab Spring gone horribly wrong...so horribly wrong that we
closed our embassy in Senaa in mid-February and in late March we
evacuated 300 military personnel from a base in southern Yemen.
Yemen...where the Houthi are battling government-backed fighters in an
effort to take control of the country and where Sunni-dominated Saudi
Arabia...in sort of a proxy war with mostly Shi'ite Iran...and a small
coalition of other neighboring Arab countries who support exiled
President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi...are ending their nearly month-long
airstrike operation...'Operation Decisive Storm'...against the Houthi
rebels and are ready to begin a new undertaking called 'Operation
Restoring Hope' which they claim will focus on security and counter terrorism.
Hoping to restore the Yemini government, the problem the Saudis now face
is that the Houthi rebels still control most of the capital of Sanaa NO matter the Saudi claim that they have “degraded Houthi-controlled
military infrastructure, including key buildings in the capital.” And,
remember too, that the Houthi have overrun the country's northern
provinces even though we gave the Saudis logistical and intelligence
support...and even though Obama begrudgingly gave the Saudi coalition
refueling aircraft and launched 'limited' airstrikes against the
Houthi.
And this was done at the very same time Obama tried to persuade the Saudis to
limit the scope of their bombing campaign against his fellow muslim
brethren and to focus instead on protecting their own borders. Translation: more
'leading from behind'...more empty words and actions that were too
little and too late allowing Obama to have NO direct involvement in the
fighting, thus keeping him...or so he thinks...from being blamed for
even more muslim deaths in a country where civilian casualties are
running high and where Saudi officials in conjunction with coalition
officials from the UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, and Kuwait say their aim is to
bring back Yemen's "security and stability through establishing a
political process.”'Establishing a political process' by countries where Obama released GITMO prisoners to...by countries NOT really America's friends.
So Obama is once again 'leading from behind' in yet another foreign policy
failure...another instance where Iran seems to be calling the
shots...another instance where Obama is going through the motions of
doing something but actually is doing NOTHING for 'leverage' and the
upper-hand is what this is all about.'Leverage'...the power or ability to act or to influence people, events, and decisions...as in Obama will do and say any and everything...including playing soldier...or in this case sailor...by putting on this military 'dog and pony' show of force to get that Iranian nuclear deal signed and in place before he leaves office...for his anything but stellar legacy...even if it means sending our warships off the coast of a place where they have NO legal authority to do what some Naval officials say they were sent to do. Sadly, the truth is that our military has been rendered impotent to follow through on any and all threats from Iran...threats that should be and would be handled post haste...as in you do NOT pull your warships back there will be NO nuclear deal of any sorts and even harsher sanctions will be put into place...if we had a strong leader instead of a traitor at the helm of America's ship.
Remember, Iran...who routinely calls for 'death to America' and is
calling all the shots in the nuclear deal...will do what they want to do
when they want to do it and Obama will NOT stop them for when all the bloviations are
said and done...when the Saudi coalition does go home...and when Iran refuses to
back down and withdraw their warships with Obama giving them the
thumbs-up from the sidelines... pretty soon we will start seeing our warships
turning around as they start heading back to 'friendly' waters having done
nothing but make us even more of a laughing stock in the eyes of the world's than we already are.Nothing to see here folks...just more of the same old same old show of American military might being rendered powerless...military might that unfortunately has Barack HUSSEIN Obama tying their hands behind their backs.
***************************************
Today, Wednesday, April 22nd, on RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on CPR
Worldwide Media from 2 to 4pm EST, Craig and Diane will discuss the
bruhaha over gay weddings, the candidates, and the Constitution;
Hillary's platform which is anything but; and U.S. warships off the
coast of Yemen.Hope you can tune in:
http://cprworldwidemedia.net/radio
And chat with us live at:
https://www.facebook.com/groups/cprworldwidemedia/




















