Op-ed:
The Case for Removing Jeff Sessions 
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

When the American people elected then candidate Trump to become President Trump, they did so in part to “drain the swamp,” and in part to go after both high level members of the Obama administration and to have investigations launched into high level misdeeds.

Senator Jeff Sessions quickly inserted himself into the inner circle of the Trump campaign becoming an adviser on nearly every decision or policy proposal Trump made during his campaign. And either Sessions himself or one of his team crafted and helped communicate Trump’s campaign immigration policy platform. And Sessions became the chair of Trump’s National Security Team, also helping Trump pick his V.P. running mate.

And we believe it is highly likely that in the early months of the campaign a deal was struck between then candidate Trump and then Senator Sessions that should Trump become president, Sessions would be rewarded with a high-level post, and that due to his time as Attorney General of the State of Alabama, the A.G. post would be the most likely fit.

We say this because just two weeks after the election, soon to become Attorney General Jeff Sessions let President-elect Trump know that he, Sessions, would not pursue Hillary, leading Trump to announce that he, Trump, was “no longer interested in pursuing a case against Hillary Clinton.” 

What follows below is a short line item list, in no particular order, of prosecutable offenses and offenders that A.G. Sessions has no interest in going after, which means what follows are key reasons why he should be removed from his post.

Let's start with Hillary's private and highly questionable if not outright illegal private server set-up in the bathroom of her Chappaqua, New York home. Saying when questioned by the F.B.I. about said server and why she used it, as in “The vast majority of my work emails went to government employees at their government addresses, which meant they were captured and preserved immediately on the system at the State Department,” means in Hillary's mind that her turning over “the vast majority” of emails equates to her having broken no laws. Never mind that said “vast majority” might be minus the emails that contain the very information that show her actually breaking the law...never mind that she most likely committed treason.

So as A.G. Sessions is now begrudgingly investigating Hillary’s server escapade because of a recent directive from the White House regarding “questions about immunity agreements that Clinton aides may have made,” it's a token investigation at best because Sessions continues to reiterate that, “It would take a factual basis that meets the standards of the appointment of a special counsel” in order for him to go forward against Hillary.

And Sessions says so even though no grand jury was ever seated to compel the turning over of key physical evidence; no matter that the D.O.J. collaborated with defense lawyers to “restrict” the F.B.I.’s ability to pursue certain lines of questioning and examine digital evidence; no matter that immunity was given to some folks who should have been charged with crimes and who should have been “pressured” to cooperate; and no matter that James Comey admitted to having written his conclusion even before Hillary was interviewed.

So instead of Sessions accepting as fact that a special council or a grand jury is exactly what would have but still can put 'teeth' into the email investigation...he instead is trying to make 'dirty herself' Huma Abedin the fall guy for all Hillary things email related.

Translation: Sessions by his what amounts to inactions is doing his very best to let Hillary remain both unscathed and unprosecuted.

And he's doing so while also letting former F.B.I. Director James Comey...the man who should have been in Sessions' prosecutable crosshairs long ago for perjury and conspiracy not to mention obstruction of justice for his exonerating of Hillary ahead of 17 witnesses being interviewed and before like we said Hillary herself had been interviewed...remains unprosecuted as well. Choosing to do absolutely nothing regarding the corruption masterminded by Comey... corruption well known, documented, and long established...it appears Jeff Sessions does not want now or ever to do anything about it.

The hard cold truth is that had any average citizen who did what Comey did, would be indicted, charged, and taken to trial. The fact that A.G. Jeff Sessions has turned both a blind eye and a deaf ear to the unlawful acts of James Comey is another line item on the list of why Sessions must be removed from office.

Now add to that growing list the name Lois Lerner, the woman who used the I.R.S. as a partisan political weapon with which to target conservative groups, and the abject inaction of A.G. Sessions to lift a finger to indict Lerner as yet another reason pointing directly to why it’s high time to remove Sessions from his post.

Not only did Lois Lerner use her position at the I.R.S. to mastermind the targeting of conservative groups, she also built a team to carry out the targeting...targeting that branched out to several I.R.S. offices in various parts of the country.

And then, when the walls of her cubical of corruption began to collapse, Lois Lerner lost her emails...24,000 of them...her hard drive “crashed” along with several other hard drives of those on her team, hard drives were destroyed, and then when investigators tried to ascertain who may have been in the I.R.S. building when Lerner’s hard drive “crashed,” they discovered that the security logs regarding who was in the building and when had been destroyed.

At the time all of these misdeeds were taking place, I.R.S. Commissioner John Koskinen was on the job, and by any outward appearances he was a part of the targeting scandal as well as being part of the cover up of it. And yet, to this day, Jeff Sessions has done nothing to hold those so deeply involved in such obvious government overreach, corruption, obstruction of justice and abuse, accountable.

Water under the bridge or is it just the swamp getting murkier by the minute?

Now around the same time as the Lois Lerner/I.R.S. issue was going on another little deal was taking place, a deal that became known as Uranium One. But what is not known about that deal was that a parcel of 600 acres of land...land encompassing roughly a square mile...is land that A.G. Jeff Sessions just happens to own. Sitting adjacent to the Choctaw National Wildlife Refuge... Sessions does not just own the physical land itself but the all-important “subsurface oil and mineral rights” to said land...land that just happens to sit atop Alabama's uranium deposits.

That's right...the state of Alabama is home to a belt of uranium that runs clear across the state and Sessions...the man who recused himself from existing D.O.J. policies concerning drilling and mining relating to environmental issues...just happens to personally own the land and hold “mineral rights”...including drilling and mining rights...to some of Alabama's uranium.

And Sessions kept silent on this little known uranium fact when appearing before his confirmation hearing.

So why is this important...because when then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton set-up and then President Obama approved and announced the sale of 20% of our uranium stocks to Russia, that sale itself dictated that said 20% had to be replenished in order to bring our country's uranium stocks back up to 100%. And where would that uranium come from...some might just come from the up-to-this-point unmined uranium deposits in Alabama...maybe even from under the ground Jeff Sessions owns the mineral rights to. Possibly then making Sessions one very rich man no matter his department's recusal from drilling and mining issues, this could be yet another reason why he will not take sides on G.O.P. demands to probe "years-old matters" connecting Hillary Clinton to Russia.

And dare we say could this be the real reason why Sessions recused himself from any and all things Russia, after all one supposed meeting with the Russian ambassador seems an unlikely reason to do so.

Now let's move on to Attorney General Loretta Lynch and two episodes she was involved in that A.G. Sessions has said he has no intention of investigating.

The first was her clandestine meeting on the tarmac and inside a private jet with former President Bill Clinton, the husband of the target of an ongoing investigation. And while all attorneys learn from the get-go that they must do everything in their power to avoid even the slightest notion of impropriety, there was A.G. Lynch in Phoenix, holding a secret meeting with the husband of the target of a D.O.J. investigation. That meeting surely violated at the very least D.O.J. ethics regulations and probably quite a bit more than that.

The other event was when A.G. Lynch told then F.B.I. Director Comey not to refer to the investigation into Hillary Clinton as an “investigation” but instead to call it a “matter.” This then saw Jed Shugerman, a law professor at Fordham University calling that bit of wordplay a “partisan intrusion” by A.G. Lynch on behalf of Hillary Clinton…quite possibly part of whatever else was discussed on that Phoenix tarmac. But we’ll go a step further and call it a violation of the Hatch Act...the act which states that, “(a)...an employee may not—(1) use his official authority or influence for the purpose of interfering with or affecting the result of an election”...proving that Lynch was intentionally trying to soften the language used in regard to her chosen 2016 presidential candidate.

And while this was a clear violation of the Hatch Act, and while violations of the Hatch Act are not criminal in nature but only rise to the level of firing a federal employee, it still leaves one to wonder who else was a part of that particular decision making process, who is still employed at either the D.O.J. or the F.B.I. that was a part of it, and why Jeff Sessions is doing abjectly nothing about investigating it.

And know that Jeff Sessions also remains noticeably quiet on Benghazi...a scandal that does indeed “make a difference” no matter that Hillary Clinton herself said it was “time to move on” after Trey Gowdy's congressional report produced no new evidence pointing to wrongdoing by the former secretary of state forever to be known to we conservatives as the 'Butcher of Benghazi.'

And by his saying that specifically there continues to remain “an insufficient basis to launch a special investigation of Hillary's actions regarding Benghazi,” A.G Jeff Sessions has turned his back on bringing to justice those responsible... as in Hillary Clinton and of course Barack HUSSEIN Obama...for the 2011 deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Shaun Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods.

In fact, just this past August, U.S. District Court Judge Amit Mehta, ruled that Loretta Lynch's D.O.J. had not been “sufficiently thorough” when responding to Freedom of Information requests by Judicial Watch for the 348 Benghazi related emails...348 out of the 30,000 not turned over emails Hillary sent via her private email server. And that ruling, by of all things an Obama appointed judge, seems to have been pushed to the side...ignored actually...by both Sessions and his D.O.J. neither of whom to date has done anything of substance concerning Hillary's covering up, let alone helping to orchestrate, the 2011 attacks on the Benghazi compound.

Then there's Jeff Sessions' stance on immigration...illegal immigration in specific. When Sessions was the junior senator from Alabama, he helped to block comprehensive immigration reform but now says ending illegal immigration is his “signature issue” at the Department of Justice. In fact, in 2006 when the G.W. Bush administration first tried to overhaul our even then seriously flawed immigration policies...including his trying to “tighten” border security...it was then Senator Sessions who lead the opposition to Bush's proposed immigration bill, and who continued to oppose anything but his version of said reform, that is until he became one of the first to jump on the 'Trump train' that is.

And while we understand Sessions' reasons for opposing both Bush's proposed reform and the 2013 Gang of Eight...saying neither went far enough...not doing anything even knowing that changes and amendments could later be added on...is exactly what allowed illegals to continue to enter our country because border security remained understaffed and overwhelmed. Not understanding that immigration reform has to start somewhere...all or nothing is no longer a viable option...Sessions cannot be trusted to follow through on what he says is now his “signature issue.” 

And why...because of both his past and present words regarding sanctuary cities, sanctuary states, and the now timely DACA/DREAMer situation.

On sanctuary cities...last year Jeff Sessions “urged” the 300+ sanctuary city mayors to rethink their policies regarding protecting illegals or else face the withholding of millions of dollars in federal assistance if their local governments could not prove that they were cooperating with federal authorities. But that “urging” turned out to be just talk.

How so...a couple of weeks ago the D.O.J. ramped up its “urging” to now “threatening” 23 sanctuary cities with subpoenas if they failed to provide documents showing whether local law enforcement officers shared information with federal immigration authorities or not. And yet even that remains mere words for what are threats and/or subpoenas if they are not followed up with actions...and to date no tangible actions by Jeff Sessions or his D.O.J. against sanctuary cities has been taken.

So while Sessions made it one of his top priorities to crack down on sanctuary cities, he has done absolutely nothing regarding the even more grievous issue of sanctuary states...states that have become a free-for-all haven for illegals... states that actually legally cannot exist as a sanctuary for anyone as it's the federal government who sets and enforces federal immigration law and nothing or no one can change that fact.

Now as for DACA and the DREAMers...Sessions did state that, “The program known as DACA that was effectuated under the Obama Administration is being rescinded,” which is a very good thing, however, it was Jeff Sessions who recommended that the Trump administration begin rolling back DACA in phases instead of doing away with it in one fell swoop. And why is this counterproductive to overall immigration reform, because with the no change to the policy that determines what information DACA recipients provide to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services is shared with immigration enforcement, and with DREAMers only facing the “risk of deportation” not deportation itself, Jeff Sessions has proven how ineffective he is on the very issue he still claims is his “signature issue.”

And the line item list for A.G. Sessions being replaced continues and includes the fact that Sessions has a rather checkered past with regard to racism. And while Sessions claims that allegations related to racism were and are false, nonetheless, those allegations prevented him from being appointed as a Federal Judge in 1986, and the sting of that, and the fact that such allegations continue to haunt him, may well play a role in his refusal to prosecute Obama, as well as Obama’s willing puppets.

Could it be that Jeff Sessions is terrified of having the race card played against him, so much so that he is unwilling to go after those who broke the laws of our nation because either those lawbreakers themselves are black, or because their puppet master is black? If so, than that alone is reason enough to remove Sessions from his position as our nation’s attorney general. Justice is to be blind, but an attorney general who allows the color of a lawbreaker’s skin to weigh into his decision as to whether or not to launch an investigation, indict, bring charges, or go to trial, is not at all the right man for the job.

And even with all listed, the line item that can never be ignored is that given all of the corruption, collusion, misdeeds, breaking of laws, and the transparent abuses of power already mentioned, we know that all of it was under the direct control of just one individual...Barack HUSSEIN Obama...and Sessions knows this yet he has no intention of doing thing one about any of it.

Remember, as President Trump began his presidency he traveled to many foreign nations, and set new policies in place as per his Constitutionally derived powers, and there was Obama, shadow traveling to the same foreign nations, meeting with the same foreign leaders, and ostensibly working to undermine U.S. foreign policy. Also, remember that the Logan Act (1 Stat. 613, 18 U.S.C. § 953, enacted January 30, 1799) is a United States federal law that criminalizes negotiation by unauthorized persons with foreign governments having a dispute with the United States.

And said disputes can be identified as anything from armed military action, to trade disputes, or simply disputes regarding the direction of foreign policy matters. Therefore, Obama has been acting in violation of the Logan Act in addition to all the unlawful acts he committed during his eight years in office with some rising to the level of treason. And while violations of the Logan Act are relatively minor by comparison, but with any violation of the Logan Act still being a felony...and while only two such cases have ever been brought with no convictions...that is no reason why Sessions shouldn’t be employing his D.O.J. with regard to the Logan Act now.

But again A.G. Jeff Sessions has no intention of pursuing any case against Obama using the excuse that prosecution could create something as serious as a Constitutional crisis to merely being a violation of protocol, but we believe there may well be something more to it than just that. Remember, Obama’s being the head of the snake and the master of the swamp did not end on January 21, 2017 when President Trump was sworn in as it continues unabated to this very day via the puppets whose strings he still pulls.

But even that does not answer specifically why Attorney General Jeff Sessions will not even consider appointing a special council to investigate Hillary Clinton or Barack HUSSEIN Obama...or why he continues to say that there is an “insufficient basis” to launch even a special investigation into just Hillary Clinton and her shenanigans alone when evidence abounds everywhere.

And so based upon all we have stated, we believe Jeff Sessions should be removed from his attorney general position post haste. The last thing our country or our president needs is a weak and ineffectual individual as our nation's 'top cop' for his actions...or lack thereof...prove that Jeff Sessions is nothing but a savvy political operator who was a bit too fast to jump on the 'Trump train' and who carefully strategized his rise within the Trump inner circle while actually working to protect those persons who should be in prison for life.

And while we believe Sessions is silently working against the very man and agenda he claims allegiance to one has to wonder why he would do so...why...we also believe that Attorney General Jeff Sessions just might be a 'Deep State' operative...a plant...we cannot say it any plainer than that.

Copyright © 2018 Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots

****************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!

Today, Friday, February 2nd, from 7 to 9pm on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss why Attorney General Jeff Session should be removed from office and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history

Op-ed:
Obama's Retaliatory Tentacles
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on CPR Worldwide Media / cprworldwidemedia.net

"I'm not going anywhere...I'm angry and ready to fight because today contradicts my public service career and my entire life." 
- New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez's words after being indicted on public corruption charges

Two Democrats...one appointed and one elected...both facing criminal charges...but only one dared to speak out against Obama's economic and foreign policies...dared to defend Israel...thus making the outcome for that one quite different than the outcome of the other one.

In the first case, in yet another of the Obama regime's attempts to sweep the IRS targeting scandal under the rug, early last week Ronald C. Machen, the former U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, informed House Speaker John Boehner that he will NOT...I repeat NOT...bring criminal contempt charges against former IRS official Lois Lerner. NO big surprise folks as Lerner did exactly what she was told to do knowing full-well that Obama and his cronies would protect her. Lerner...the main figure in the targeting of Conservative and TEA Party groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt status...extra scrutiny simply because they opposed Obama during both his 2008 and 2012 presidential election bids... was rewarded for a job well done in that she got to use one of her many Obama and Holder supplied 'get out of jail free' cards...all while questions continue to be raised and continue to go unanswered about Obama's in-our-face ability to ignore a congressional directive.

It's now been almost a year since the House approved a contempt resolution against Lerner arising from her decision NOT to answer questions during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing where she invoked her Fifth Amendment right NOT to testify. This led then committee chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) to rightfully say that Lerner had waived that right by asserting her innocence during an opening statement and then refusing to be cross-examined by committee members. But U.S. Attorney Machen...a Democrat and obviously an Obama supporter...insisted that Lerner only made “general claims of innocence” and that the Constitution would provide her, in his legal opinion, with “an absolute defense should she be prosecuted.”

In his letter to Boehner, Machen claimed his decision NOT to bring said charges against Lerner was NOT a rejection per se of the House’s constitutional powers to call witnesses and hold them in contempt when and if they violate the rules, but that the facts in Lerner's case “undercut” the House decision...translating into Machen's opinion that Lerner did NOT waive her Constitutional protection. But know this case is surely NOT going to simply fade away as it continues to raise questions about the powers of Congress and whether the president and the rest of the executive branch have 'discretion'...as in an obligation...to follow orders of Congress. I believe they do as the executive branch must answer to Congress and Congress must in turn answer to 'We the People.'

In the second case involving Democratic New Jersey Senator Bob Menendez the outcome was quite different as a federal grand jury turned a longtime friendship into a corruption case. Indicting Menendez on 14 public corruption charges ranging from bribery to making false statements to conspiracy and more relating to “dealings and interventions” he 'supposedly' made on behalf of his friend and senatorial campaign contributor, Dr. Salomon Melgen, a West Palm Beach, Florida, ophthalmologist, who now is also facing criminal charges.

Assistant U.S. Attorney General Leslie Caldwell in announcing the indictments said that Menendez never disclosed any of the 'reportable gifts' he received from Melgen on the required financial disclosure forms. And so unreported gifts turned into indictments claiming that Menendez intervened on Melgen’s behalf in a dispute with federal regulators over Medicare billing charges and irregularities, and in a bid by Melgen to secure a port security contract in the Dominican Republic. Menendez, as expected, denied any wrongdoing and said that any of the close to one million dollars in gifts he received from Melgen...which included almost $600,000 in campaign contributions...were given to him solely because of their close personal friendship of over 20+ years.

And Menendez must be presumed innocent until proven guilty because charges contained in an indictment are only an accusation NOT a verdict. In the meantime, Mendendez, one of our leading voices on foreign affairs, has stepped-down as the ranking member on the Foreign Relations Committee but will remain a committee member. And the Foreign Relations Committee where Menendez dared to call Obama to task over his anything but a strategy in combating ISIS; where he opposed Obama's efforts to restore diplomatic relations with Cuba; and where he loudly voiced that he wants increased sanctions placed against Iran (“Iran is clearly taking steps that can only be interpreted as provocative...yet the administration appears willing to excuse away any connection between these developments and signs of Iran's bad faith in negotiations.”); is at the crux of Menedez being called to task. And why...because Menendez had the fortitude and audacity to publicly and on the record oppose Obama...and if you oppose Obama you must pay the price for that opposition even if you are a fellow Democrat.

And you must pay a big price if you dare to oppose Obama's stabbing Israel in the back, as Menendez did recently at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's national convention, where he pledged that Iran would "never threaten Israel or its neighbors, and it will never be in a position to start a nuclear arms race in the Middle East. Not on my watch."

Fighting words our traitor-in-chief will NOT let go unpunished. And we know the Obama regime is notorious for punishing those who disagree with them, oppose them, or speak ill of them...and party affiliation matters not. One case in point is Mary Landrieu and her bid to win a fourth term as one of Louisiana's senators. Remember, Obama himself, his people, their money, and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee...who pulled their TV advertising in support of her...cast her aside come runoff time simply because she spoke out in support of the Keystone Pipeline...which Obama and the liberal environmentalists are vehemently against.

Also, remember when New York Democratic Senator Chuck Schumer second-guessed both Obama and his signature piece of legislation... ObamaCare...by saying, "We took their mandate and put all focus on the wrong problem - health care reform," and even went so far as to say that since only about 5% of registered voters in the United States lacked health insurance before the implementation of the law, that to focus on a problem affecting such "a small percentage of the electoral made no political sense." In other words, Schumer publicly voiced his opinion that Democrats should NOT have passed ObamaCare when they did because the country was still in the throws of a recession even after the passing of the 2009 stimulus bill, and that a logical follow-up to said bill should have been legislation to help the middle class. In fact, Schumer even stated that only later on in the Obama presidency should the issue of health care have been addressed.

And the fallout from the regime for his words...first, then House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi publicly stated that there are "14 million reasons why" Schumer is wrong...referencing the number of Americans 'newly insured' under ObamaCare but of course leaving out the millions of folks who lost their insurance because of ObamaCare...and second, Menendez was chastised in the media for daring to speak out against the 'anointed one.' And the media payback went so far as to accuse Menendez of grandstanding for his own self-interest, personal gain, and political ambitions, to the effect that some in his own party publicly came out to accuse him of saying what he said simply because he wanting to be Hillary's VP choice when she ran.

And then there's Democratic Representative Tulsi Gabbard from Hawaii, a twice-deployed Iraq War veteran, who criticized Obama for downplaying the ISIS threat. Saying, “Every soldier knows this simple fact: If you don’t know your enemy, you will not be able to defeat him...our leaders must clearly identify the enemy as Islamist extremists, understand the ideology that is motivating them and attracting new recruits, and focus on defeating that enemy both militarily and ideologically,” the retaliation was swift in coming.

Almost immediately after Gabbard spoke these words the Obama 'attack machine' led by Bob Jones of the Oahu-based Midweek newspaper ran his editorial stating, “I take serious issue when somebody who’s done a little non-fighting in Iraq, and is not a Middle East or Islamic scholar, claims to know better than our President and Secretary of State how to fathom the motivations of terrorists, or how to refer to them beyond the term that best describes them — terrorists.” And Democrat Michael Perry of Hawaii’s KSSK radio said he's worried about the political payback for what he called Gabbard's "mortal sin" for her daring to speak out against Obama. “While Gabbard is correct in her ‘emperor has no clothes’ moment, she may have lost her future seat on Hawaii’s political bench,” he said...words that sound like a threat of sorts to me.

And let's NOT forget that some Democrats are speaking out against Obama's executive order on immigration...on amnesty...including Clair McCaskill (MO), Joe Donnelly (IN), Heidi Heitkamp (ND), and Independent but caucuses with the Democrats Angus King (MA) amongst them. And the retaliation against them will surely come for NO one dares to cross Obama or his cronies and gets away with it.

So the bottom line in all this is that even Democrats are NOT safe from the retaliatory tentacles of a man and his cronies who think of themselves as  gods...never to be questioned...never to be crossed...and above all never to be second-guessed.

Op-ed: 

The saga of the missing emails drones on ad-nauseum 
By: Diane Sori

"There may have been nefarious conduct that went much higher than Lois Lerner."
House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp

Just as a federal judge orders the IRS to explain under oath how the 'infamous' missing emails were lost now comes this...according to IRS information-technology (IT) experts it seems back-up tapes...considered an option of last resort for recovering any missing emails...have suddenly and miraculously been found even though the IRS kept claiming all these many months that the physical hard drive was either recycled or destroyed.

Still claiming "there is an issue" as to whether all the backup tapes were destroyed, IRS Commissioner John Koskinen confirmed they do indeed exist and that they were only 'scratched' NOT irreparably damaged as previously claimed...while at the same time talking out of both sides of his mouth by saying he does NOT know "how they found them" or "whether there's anything on them or not."

So it seems the proverbial buck is being passed yet again...all while wishing that the buck would just go away...and whining about who exactly 'they' are.

Also, remember the IRS said that while NOT done on purpose, Lerner’s hard drive was wiped clean and sent to an 'outside' disposal company to be “shredded”...more likely to be taken apart and melted down so that all incriminating evidence would be destroyed. The IRS also claimed that it tried everything possible to recover Lerner’s emails, including sending her computer for examination to a forensic expert within the IRS's criminal division.

Within the IRS's criminal division...gee...why didn't the IRS let outside non-partisan experts examine said computer...I think the answer to that is quite obvious.

So now we have yet another case of IRS deception honed to a fine art if you will... and a deception billed like all the others...marked 'payment due' to 'We the People.'

Fact: to date the IRS has spent almost 10 million of our taxpayer dollars to collect and turn over the documents asked for by the congressional investigators, including the gathering up and again turning over of 67,000 emails to and from Lerner that still happen to exist. But ain't it odd that 67,000 emails just happen to exist but none of those are from the time period in question.

And so the game continues on as the IRS has said time and again that the reason NO copies of Lerner’s emails were available from the time period in question is because during that time they only backed-up emails for six months on tapes then recycled those tapes for reuse, erasing the existing data to assure clean tapes. Yet out of those 67,000 emails that do exist some are from before the time the IRS claims they only backed-up emails for six months.

Hmmm...selective losing of specific incriminating emails I would say.

And par for the course of those appointed by this administration...they LIE...for when all the bloviations and rhetoric are stripped away, the fact is that these emails were 'selectively' destroyed for what they contained...or for who they would expose. And even as House Republicans and at least one and possibly more federal judges grasp at straws and want to know if Lerner’s hard drive could possibly be tracked using a serial number and then restored, IRS IT experts recently said under oath that Lerner’s hard drive had indeed been wiped clean by tech staff and recycled by an unnamed outside contractor.

But if this wiping clean and destruction of the hard drive did indeed take place, where is some sort of invoice or a 'certificate of destruction' proving this happened. And with Koskinen saying he isn’t sure anything of the sort exists...that means that if one does NOT exist how does anyone know any of this actually happened... simply we do NOT.

Yet even ignoring this fact and just working on the premise that by some chance a restoration was possible...and it's claimed that one contractor did identify the hard drive serial number but supposedly the IRS does NOT keep records of serial numbers (yeah right)...we know it would NEVER be allowed to happen for Barack HUSSEIN Obama has too much to lose if it did. 

 

Too much to lose like the fact that his brother Malik applied for and got 501 (c)(3) status for the Islamic Da’wa Organization...of which he is Executive Secretary...an organization that is part of the coalition of 'supposed' charities headed by global Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi, Yet this anything but benign 'charity' was fast tracked and received the all-important tax-exempt status from none other than Lois Lerner herself.

And heaven forbid one or more of those missing emails shows a conversation between Lerner and Obama himself concerning the fast-tracked status for a group tied directly to a terrorist organization...tied directly to the Muslim Brotherhood...a terrorist organization that Barack HUSSEIN Obama outwardly supports.

And too much to lose if it becomes wildly known that Obama's very own grandmother heads the 'Sarah Obama Benevolent Fund' another 'supposed' charity that hides the fact that it uses monies raised to give scholarships to male Kenyan students to attend the most radical of Wahhabist madrases in Saudi Arabia. Monies raised under false premises so these students can study the intricacies of sharia law, and then upon their completion of studies more 'charity' monies are used to send them to other countries to help aid in their setting-up of sharia compliant enclaves within those countries.

And again, none other than Lois Lerner herself gave this anything but a legitimate charity their 501(c)(3) status...on Obama's orders perhaps.

Blood brethren on both accounts you know.

And lest we forget what started this whole sorted mess...the targeting of TEA Party and Conservative groups...delaying their applications if NOT outright denying them their rightful tax-exempt status. And did those missing emails point directly to Obama there too...I think a very good case could be made for that as well.

So as the IRS lie-fest continues...as Lois Lerner and John Koskinen dig themselves into an ever-deepening hole...and as the cover-up of Obama's hand in all this continues to take shape...all I can say is this is the new reality of all that is the Obama administration's DC...sad isn't it.

Op-ed: 

Is the key to the IRS scandal hiding in Russia...part 3 of 3 

By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen

As more testimony is given in the IRS scandal it's becoming obvious that the missing e-mails could very well be the key to collapsing the entire Obama administration, but it first must be understood that the IRS e-mails were NOT being secured because the IRS did NOT want them to be secured...period.

And why...because e-mail messages are considered official documents and can be offered as evidence in court and therefore can be legally binding...especially e-mails regarding the transaction of official business...of IRS business.

And the missing e-mails in question needed to be destroyed because...we believe ...they contained evidence that the IRS...a supposed nonpartisan government agency...knowingly engaged in criminal activities to cover for the actions of Barack HUSSEIN Obama as explained in part 2 of this investigative report (http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/06/op-ed-is-key-to-irs-scandal-hiding-in.html). We also believe that NSA whistle blower Edward Snowden could also have noticed something was amiss at the IRS especially concerning e-mail correspondence...and with his vast computer expertise he could have 'secured' copies of those e-mails for himself out of fear such incriminating e-mails would go missing...which indeed they did...as outlined in part 1 of this report (http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2014/06/24/is-the-key-to-the-irs-scandal-hiding-in-russia-part-1/).
   

Now what everyone needs to understand is how the IRS...a mega-agency that according to government records spent more than $4 billion on contracts labeled 'information technology and software' over the last five years...yet according to last week's testimony by IRS Commissioner John Koskinen himself...the IRS had NO funds with which to save and store e-mails due to budgetary constraints...due to “declining budget resources”...that he claimed prevented the agency from spending the $10 million needed to save and store e-mails...basically to upgrade their system from having to use tape for backups, from having to use hard-drives instead of servers to store information, and from only having the capacity to hold information garnered for six months.

Now ain't that a kick as 'We the People' are told to store our records for a minimum of seven years yet the very agency telling us to do just that only stores their information for six months...talk about the epitome of hypocrisy.

Excuse me but with $4 billion dollars having been spent over five years...and what a coincidence that such extravagant spending occurred during the exact time frame that Barack HUSSEIN Obama has been in office...that $10 million could NOT have been put aside from their $4 billion spending spree for such an important endeavor as securing critical interdepartmental e-mails. Of course it couldn't and for very good reason as those e-mails (we believe) were NEVER intended to be saved because to save them would possibly risk exposing...if they fell into the wrong hands...hands like those of Edward Snowden...the truth about an administration and about a traitor of a president run amok.

NO...that could NOT be risked so all e-mails of critical importance that tied Obama in any way into the IRS scandal...especially those between Lois Lerner and Obama himself..had to go 'poof' either by using the cooked up phony crashed computer story or by someone simply hand destroying the hard-drives themselves.

But the question remains where was $4 billion of our taxpayer dollars spent if it was NOT spent on securing and protecting these critical computers and the important information they housed...well let me tell you and it will NOT make you, the reader, happy at all. First, between 2010 and 2012...covering most of the time frame of the missing e-mails...some $50 million of that $4 billion was spent by the IRS on 220 conference trips...with $38 million of that in 2010 alone. And if you break that $50 million down into more easily recognizable and manageable numbers that comes out to $227,272.72 being spent on each conference trip. And this includes our tax dollars being spent on...actually wasted on...$3,500 per night hotel rooms, promotional materials, paintings, and other frivolities all while our economy was tanking, many were without jobs or health insurance, and some even without a roof over their heads.

Now let's look at one conference in particular...a conference approved by then IRS Deputy Commissioner Mark Ernst (who left the IRS in 2010), and then Commissioner Steve Miller... one of many conferences where our taxpayer dollars were spent on IRS hierarchy having a grand old time instead of having those monies spent on securing and upgrading IRS computers. In 2010, with the IRS already engaged in the targeting of TEA Party and Conservative groups seeking 501(c)(3) status, they had the audacity to spend $4.1 million for its entire management staff to attend the Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) Division Conference, called 'Leading into the Future,' held in Anaheim, California...a conference where none of those attending were required to document their attendance at the supposedly important training sessions.

But where exactly did the money for this conference come from...according to SB/SE Division management, they were allocated $132.7 million in the IRS's FY 2010 budget to hire 1,315 full-time employees, and the conference was paid for with what they called "leftover money" as they did NOT hire all the employees they could have hired...all the Americans they could have put back to work.

However, a complaint about this conference's cost was filed, and after conducting a thorough investigation the Treasury Department's then Inspector General for Tax Administration Steve Miller (who was forced to resign amid revelations that the IRS targeted conservative groups for special scrutiny and who was replaced by Daniel Werfel who was then replaced by John Koskinen) concluded that the IRS did indeed spend excessive sums of money on what they deemed to be "questionable expenses" during this conference.

And "questionable expenses" they were with some of the 2,600 attendees receiving high-priced baseball tickets and stays in 'presidential' hotel suites that normally cost $1,500 to $3,500 per night. And the 15 non-IRS speakers at the conference were paid a total of $135,000 in fees, with artist Erik Wahl being paid $17,000 to talk about what was called "leadership through art"... like art has anything to do with IRS business...and another $11,430 being paid for so-called 'positive psychology' guru Shawn Achor...referred to as a 'happiness expert'...to lead a 90-minute workshop. I guess the only one made happy by that expenditure was Achor himself because I know 'We the People' sure ain't happy about our hard-earned tax payer dollars being spent on such nonsense.                            

Also, at this conference was shown two now infamous videos...the 5 minute and 40 second 'Star Trek' video that consisted of a scripted presentation featuring SB/SE Division managers portraying Star Trek characters in a 'supposed' tax-themed parody that SB/SE Division upper-level executives claimed was used to open the conference by highlighting "current issues facing the IRS and SB/SE [Division] in the leadership arena and set the stage for the many topics being covered at the conference," and the other called the 'SB/SE Cupid Shuffle' where IRS managers were seen dancing on a stage. And the cost to make these two videos...over $50,100 of our taxpayer dollars spent on pure unadulterated nonsense that had NOTHING really to do with the IRS or the actual business being conducted at the conference.

But the most egregious aspect of this most egregious of conferences...besides the $35,800 spent on three planning trips before the conference...remains the fact that about $3.2 million of the $4.1 million spent (actually spending when all was said and done $4,297,285 but the IRS could NEVER account for the additional $1 million plus spent) did indeed come from the unused funds that had been allocated for hiring...meaning instead of creating all the jobs the monies had been allocated for...instead of putting Americans back to work...the IRS spent that which they called "leftover money" on themselves...as in to party hardy on our taxpayer dime and 'We the People' be damned.

So now we have a 'perfect storm' brewing between an arrogant government agency who thinks they're untouchable...sounds a bit like the 'anointed one' doesn't it...and a gutless Congress who holds hearing after hearing to get to the bottom of what should be in-your-face obvious and who in the end will most likely do NOT a thing...thus leaving it up to the likes of Edward Snowden or others like him to do what needs to be done...that is find and release the missing e-mails for all to see...for all to realize that they've been duped by the man who would be king.

Now that we have shown, beyond ANY reasonable doubt that a lack of funding was not responsible for not having the sort of computers or retention services necessary to minimize hard drive failures and properly store emails and documents at the IRS, as Commissioner Koskinen fraudulently claimed in hearings last week, it’s time to take a hard and fast look at the probabilities OF having 7 key hard drive crashes such as those that supposedly wiped out the subpoenaed documents.

Professor Ken Homa at Georgetown University looked into this and what he discovered is stunning.

According to BackBlaze, an IT group that tests hard drives, tens of thousands of them at a time by keeping them running 24/7/365 until they crash…of average consumer grade hard drives, about 4perent fail annually. Only 4 percent.  Of the LOWEST grade hard drives available, the failure rate is about 25 percent annually.

During the hearings last week, Congressman Massie of Kentucky challenged Koskinen as to how many computers are used in the IRS and how many hard drives crashed.

According to Koskinen…90,000 employees suffer about 2000 hard drive crashes per year which points to the 4-5 percent category and NOT the 25 percent group of lowest rated hard drives available so…and hold onto your seats…by using a factor of 7 because of the 7 key hard drives...the odds of them failing all at the same time are...

Well, let’s put it this way…the odds are better that you will be struck and killed by lightning (1 in 2,320,000) than you becoming a saint recognized by the Catholic church (1 in 20 million) and yet we are asked to believe that 7 key people of interest in the IRS targeting scandal all had their emails wiped out when their individual hard drives crashed…all just days after first being notified that house committees were interested in LOOKING at those emails when the odds against that VERY thing are…a staggering 6 BILLION to 1.

To put this another way…while the odds of such a 7-way hard drive crash at the IRS is 1 in 6 billion…YOUR odds of being audited are about 1 in 104 and while the IRS only keeps THEIR crucial information for 6 months, you had damn well better have the last 7 YEARS of yours.

It’s clear that these 7 key hard drives didn’t just up and fail but, to wrap all this up…exactly to whom did these 7 hard drives belong?

Agent Julie Chen, IRS ID number 31261 an Exempt Organizations Official in the Cincinnati office.

Agent Nancy Heagney, IRS ID number 31306…another Exempt Organizations Official from the Cincinnati office who worked under Lois Lerner.

Both Chen and Heagney would be considered small fish and likely the “couple of rogue agents” cited by Obama in the early days of this breaking scandal…those he would gladly throw under the bus in order to stay above the fray himself but, the fish get bigger.

Supervisory Agent Tyler Chumney, IRS ID number 31321 who, like Heagney and Chen operated out of the Cincinnati office and likely the supervisor to whom Heagney and Chen reported.

Then, there’s Agent Kimberly Kitchens, IRS ID number 31457 who, along with the previous three, worked in Cincinnati and Kitchens was also a donor to Obama’s 2012 campaign.

What we can take from the information on these IRS employees is that the spate of computer crashes were not confined to, as we have been led to believe, the DC office but also took place in Cincinnati meaning that the odds of these 7 hard drive crashes occurring in 2 separate offices to the exact 7 key people whose emails had just been drawn into question just went from 1 in 6 billion to something substantially more improbable.

Every scandal complete with a cover up needs someone to handle PR and feed the media only what propaganda is deemed suitable and the IRS targeting scandal seems to have had their own, built-in control for just such an occasion…IRS National Media Relations Chief Michelle Eldridge, the woman who took the IRS through the media gauntlet after IRS whistle blowers were targeted by the agency AND from allegations leveled by none other than CHUCK GRASLEY when the IRS leaked confidential info on Conservatives to the LIBERAL nonprofit organization, ProPublica.

And, it gets even more interesting when one considers that Eldridge met with Joe Biden, in the White House, on March 22nd 2010…about the time the targeting scandal started.

Want one more?

How about Former Chief of Staff to IRS Commissioner Steven Miller, one Agent Nikole Flax who also worked for Lois Lerner in the Exempt Organization division. Yes, that’s the exact same Nikole Flax whose name appears on the WHITE HOUSE VISITOR LOGS a surprising 31 times between... July 12th, 2010 and…May 10th, 2013…exactly 3 days before the targeting scandal went public last year.

Still not convinced that this targeting scandal goes all the way to the Oval Office?

You may not be familiar with the name Jeanne Lambrew but she met with Flax TWICE, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, next door to the West Wing of the White House where the offices for White House staff are housed and Jeane Lambrew, a top aide to Barack Hussein Obama did in fact, act as a conduit for confidential info on Conservative groups with…Lois Lerner.

It’s now time to connect the dots by asking a few pertinent questions.

What are the chances that all six of the IRS agents and executives named above along with Lois Lerner had their hard drives crash, in concert just days after first being asked to turn over their emails?

Well…as we now know…the chances are 1 in 6 billion.

Why would a top aide to Obama, one we know acted as an agent in exchanging confidential information regarding Conservative groups during the IRS targeting scandal, be meeting with the former Chief of Staff to the IRS Commissioner who also worked for Lois Lerner during the targeting scandal if Obama himself wasn’t intimately involved?

If Obama isn’t intimately involved, there would be no reasonable explanation for the Flax and Lambrew meetings.

Why would Lois Lerner be giving the fast tax exempt green light to the organizations highlighted in part 2 of this series (http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/06/op-ed-is-key-to-irs-scandal-hiding-in.html) if Obama wasn’t intimately involved?

She wouldn’t.

Along with the criminal activities exposed here in this 3 part series, the IRS has also violated privacy laws by leaking confidential information on American citizens to the FBI, obstructed house and senate investigations, and Lois Lerner has been found to be in contempt while current IRS Commissioner John Koskinen may well have committed perjury during his testimony last week.

Given all of this and what is undoubtedly yet to come, is there any reasonable reason to believe that the IRS can or should be trusted as the enforcement arm of Obamacare?

Simple answer…no way in hell.

Given what we have presented in this 3 part series, can anyone reasonably believe that Obama didn’t know of the IRS targeting of Conservative groups until he heard about it in the media?

Absolutely not.

Can ANYONE reasonably believe THIS statement from Obama on the day the IRS targeting scandal broke…May 13th, 2013: "If in fact IRS personnel engaged in the kind of practices that have been reported on, and were intentionally targeting conservative groups, then that's outrageous. And there's no place for it. And they have to be held fully accountable. Because the IRS as an independent agency, requires absolute integrity and people have to have confidence that they're applying it in a nonpartisan way. Applying the laws in a nonpartisan way. And you should feel that way regardless of party. I don't care whether you're a Democrat, Independent or a Republican."

Can anyone now reasonably doubt that Obama was launching a preemptive strike against what he knew would be breaking news regarding the IRS targeting scandal just one week earlier when he told graduates:

Edmund Burke said: “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent,” and given the long and growing list of abuses of power, contempt, high crimes and misdemeanors and treason committed over the past 5 ½ years…tyranny is not “lurking around the corner…” it is personified by Obama’s insistence that “people of good conscience remain silent.”

Can ANY credibility be assigned to Obama's response to a question regarding the possibility of corruption or mass corruption at play in the IRS targeting scandal when he said: “Not even mass corruption -- not even a smidgen of
corruption?"

Are you kidding?

And while we realized that the theory put forth in Part 1 of this series (http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2014/06/24/is-the-key-to-the-irs-scandal-hiding-in-russia-part-1/) appeared on its face to be something of a stretch, with what we have exposed in Parts 2 (http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/06/op-ed-is-key-to-irs-scandal-hiding-in.html) and here in part 3 of this series, what do you now think are the chances that there were enough red flags flying to garner the interest and attention of Ed Snowden and that he just might, in fact, have copies of the emails the IRS claims are now unrecoverable?

A whole hell of a lot less than 1 in 6 billion…and if the names Lois Lerner, Nikole Flax, Nancy Heagney, Julie Chen, Tyler Chumney, Kimberly Kitchens or Michelle Eldridge just happen to appear on the Ed Snowden leaked, soon to be published full list of all Americans upon whom the NSA was spying…the odds against Snowden having copies of those incriminating emails drops significantly.

Obviously, the targeting scandal was not just a couple of rogue agents in the Cincinnati office, it was a rogue agency operating above the law and we believe at the personal direction of Barack Hussein Obama for his political gain and to seek political revenge on his behalf.

This is a Constitutional Republic not a dictatorship.

We are a nation of laws and when government agencies, our highest elected officials and government as a whole are allowed to operate outside and above the law there can be no reasonable expectation that the people of the nation should act within or abide by the law.

***********************************************************

Sources:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/06/04/breaking-report-shows-lavish-spending-at-irs-conference/
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/06/27/irs-spent-4-4-billion-on-it-over-past-five-years/
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/03/18731628-2010-irs-conference-featured-happiness-expert-17k-art-session?lite
http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/26/meet-the-seven-irs-employees-whose-computers-crashed/
http://kenhoma.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/what-are-the-odds-of-7-specific-irs-hard-drives-crashing/

Op-ed: 

The IRS scandal is tied directly to terrorist funding
By: Diane Sori

ISIS flag appearing throughout Iraq

“Above all, Iraqi leaders must rise above their differences and come together around a political plan for Iraq’s future...Now, it’s not the place for the United States to choose Iraq’s leaders."
- Barack HUSSEIN Obama's words as he stabs the Iraqi people in the back

As the flag of the ISIS terrorists fly over one of Iraq's main oil fields...as the ISIS terrorists have taken control of one of Saddam's old chemical and biological weapons facilities (proof by the way that George W.Bush was right)...Barack HUSSEIN Obama in yet another 'smile-for-the-cameras' photo-op news conference, basically said to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki that the insurgent situation currently ongoing in Iraq is his problem alone to solve.

Saddam's WMD plant taken by ISIS

So now it's official that all America fought for...that all American blood spilled and treasure spent... has all been for naught because this vile and traitorous man announced that we will NOT be putting 'boots on the ground' to help solve what he deems to be Iraq's internal issues between political factions and NOTHING more.

Saying he will NOT chose sides in the Shi'ite vs Sunni vs Kurds battle, the simple truth often overlooked is that Barack HUSSEIN Obama has already chosen sides...choosing sides long ago...for all three sides in the Iraqi conflict are muslim, and with his allegiances always lying with the muslims he wins NO matter which side triumphs as all are his blood brethren.

And so to placate we here at home and to make it appear as if he's doing something, Obama announced that he will be sending 300 U.S. military advisers to Iraq to 'advise' the Iraqi army and NOTHING more. Adding that with the increase in pertinent information gathered because of said 300 advisers, Obama made it clear that he will NOT launch...for now anyway...any air strikes or intervene militarily in the battle for Iraq.

ISIS is well equipped

So what Obama is doing...or should I say NOT doing...amounts to NOTHING for when dealing with barbarians brute force must NOT just match brute force but must be stronger than the brute force of those who are the enemy. But with America's enemies being Obama's friends what his actions...or lack thereof...are doing is actually once again 'aiding and abetting' the enemy during a time of war.

And so in the country where purple fingers were NOT that long ago displayed with pride...a country that was NEVER really ready for democracy in the first place... Obama had the audacity to bloviate that what Iraq needs is new leadership that is more 'accommodating' toward the country’s ethnic and religious minorities...same basic garbage he spews here at home. One only has to look at our southern border to see his words in action.

And as Iraq heats up one can't help but remember Obama's words that the call to muslim prayer is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth," proving beyond all doubt that he is muslim in his heart, mind, and soul. And being a muslim ties him directly to factions currently tearing Iraq apart.

The words of UG leader al-Qaradawi

And with Barack HUSSEIN Obama's true allegiances indeed lying with America's enemies...America's very own 'agent of islam' (thanks Craig)...has direct family ties to Wahhabist interests in Saudi Arabia and to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and elsewhere.

Briefly, these ties go deep to include Obama’s brother Malik Obama (a US resident since 1985) who is Executive Secretary of the Islamic Da’wa Organization (also spelled Dawah or Da'wah)...one of 50 worldwide islamic fundraising groups that are part of the coalition of the UG (Union of Good)...a coalition of 'supposed' charities headed by global Muslim Brotherhood leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi. And the UG along with the groups falling within its auspices were designated by the U.S. Department of Treasury as a terrorist entity under Executive Order 13224 issued on September 23, 2001 by George W. Bush.

Da'wa...part of the UG

So now we have Da'wa...an organization that raises, collects, and sends monies to, amongst other terrorist groups, Hamas...having as its Executive Secretary Barack HUSSEIN Obama's brother...Da'wa an organization that was granted 501-(c)(3) status (number 26-2461342) by none other than Lois 'My E-mails Went Poof' Lerner herself. And could Obama himself have ordered that his brother's group be granted said status because he, Obama, was a supporter or even a donor to Da'wa NEVER mind that they were listed by the U.S. government as a terrorist entity. So that meant to get 501(c)(3) status terrorist supporting Da'wa either had to be removed from that list by an Executive Order of Obama's or that the IRS was ordered to ignore the designation already in place...and either scenario is unacceptable.

Thanks to their 501(c)(3) status

And could the missing Lerner e-mails in part include proof of donations by Barack HUSSEIN Obama to his brother's Hamas supporting organization...to his brother's muslim terrorist organization. Or could the granting of 501(c)(3) status to a terrorist group by the IRS be traced directly back to the White House. Could this be why a specific batch of Lerner's e-mails went 'poof'...just a little something to think about as you now shake your head in disgust over the Obama family's ties to Wahhabist extremists in Saudi Arabia.

It seems that Obama's grandmother, Sarah, heads the 'Sarah Obama Benevolent Fund' a 'supposed' charity to help underprivileged children and widows by improving their housing, education, and upbringing (as per their literature) in Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Raising 90% of its monies from donors (and again maybe Obama is one of those donors) here in the U.S. and to a lesser extent in Europe... this fund is NOT quite what it seems on the surface for according to Obama's cousin Musa Ismail Obama...in an Al-Jazeera interview...the bulk of the 'Sarah Fund' sends little to widows and orphans, instead the monies raised go towards free scholarships to send Kenyan students to the top three most radical Wahhabist madrases in Saudi Arabia to study sharia law.

Obama and Sarah...he knows all

And Wahhabis...the main faith of those in Saudi Arabia and of al-Qaeda operatives including the majority of the members of ISIS...is an extreme form of islam that insists on a literal interpretation of the qur'an, with strict adherents believing that all those who do NOT practice their form of islam are heathens and enemies...meaning off with their heads in the name of allah.

Once given monies to help fund their studies of the intricacies and implementation of sharia law, these students than disperse worldwide to set-up sharia compliant enclaves...perhaps even some right here in America...and a great portion of those monies come from the Obama family. And rest assured that Obama himself has always known exactly what they were doing. And by the way, Lois Lerner also granted this group their 501(c)(3) status.

Are you sick yet knowing our government...that our president...makes it easy for terrorists to raise money but stops TEA Party and conservative groups from doing the same....I know I am.

So just as Obama sealed all the information regarding 'Fast and Furious,' now we have Lois Lerner's critical e-mails gone missing...e-mails that (I believe) tie Obama and/or his family into the direct funding of terrorist groups as the IRS scandal is bigger than just NOT giving TEA Party and conservative groups 501 (c)(3) status as you just know that some...if NOT most...of those monies raised by the above mentioned groups likely find their way into the ISIS war chest as all these groups outwardly support the terrorist takeover of Iraq.

Tweet from a senior DHS adviser

And all this is consistent with what was always the ultimate goal of Barack HUSSEIN Obama... America's enemy within...as he continues on with his plans to collapse our beloved America. And what better way to do it domestically than by overloading us with scandal after scandal as our economy slowly collapses while we're focused elsewhere, and as islam makes more inroads into both our halls of government (as witnessed by the photo above) and into the fabric of our American society. And know these scandals are NOT random occurrences but carefully crafted manipulations by those who pull Obama's strings...string-pullers like the infamous Valerie Jarrett who has direct links to the Muslim Brotherhood and whose family is rife with radical ties.

As for Obama's foreign policy plan it really is quite simple...by shaming America in the world's eye he hopes our collapse will surely follow.

family history is rife with radical ties

family history is rife with radical tiesAnd know that an opposite plan is used for foreign policy where Obama's actions are deliberately weak at best for the few actions he does take are contrary to the long term interests and safety of the nations involved and to the safety of our own country as well.But least we forget that Barack HUSSEIN Obama's driving force and allegiance was clear right from the start...never hidden from view but one people chose to ignore...from the his book 'The Audacity of Hope' page 261..."I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction."

Sadly, those words say it all...and sadly he has done just that.

**************************************************************************

As many of you know my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOT partner and friend, Craig Andresen, is in facebook jail until June 26th, so I have been posting his articles for him. Please click this link: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2014/06/20/weekend-edition-obama-american-agent-of-islam-part-1/ to go directly to Craig's blog 'The National Patriot' to read his newest article. 

********************************************

REMINDER!!!

As we continue to work towards forcing this regime to answer to 'We the People' for high crimes and misdemeanors, we ask that you SIGN AND SHARE OUR PETITION BY CLICKING HERE... https://www.change.org/petitions/sen-ted-cruz-impeach-and-arrest-barack-hussein-obama-on-the-grounds-of-aiding-and-abetting-the-enemy-as-per-18-u-s-code-2339a  All we need is 100,000 signatures to force Obama himself to address our concerns!!!